Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Danger\s+sign\s+paranoia\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Danger\s+sign\s+paranoia\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Danger sign paranoia (score: 1): Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb); Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:59:06 +0000; Guy, IMHO the public is in a perpetual state of paranoia these days. A posted sign implying any kind of danger will only feed this. It appears that just the thought of something even remotely dangero; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00252.html (8,880 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Danger sign paranoia (score: 1): Author: k3nd@yahoo.com (GALE STEWARD); Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 05:16:48 -0800 (PST); Maybe a sign saying "KEEP OUT - BIRD SANCTUARY" might put a positive spin on things! GL, Stew K3ND... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos - Share your holi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00253.html (8,671 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Danger sign paranoia (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 08:28:49 -0500; Hundreds of piles of fake dog poop would stop people from strolling through the yard, but it won't help any liability problems if someone gets a tiny little boo-boo from touching the antenna. It is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00254.html (7,802 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Danger sign paranoia (score: 1): Author: N6ZO@aol.com (N6ZO@aol.com); Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:12:33 EST; At a pond near where I live they had forever posted signs saying no fishing, No trespassing, water moccasin danger area. There was always someone fishing there. Last year right beside the sign I note; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00255.html (7,163 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Danger sign paranoia (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:19:23 -0800; My friend applied for a conditional use permit for his crank-up tower about a year ago. As part of the permiting process his neighbors were notified and a publice hearing was held. One of the letters; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00256.html (10,854 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Danger sign paranoia (score: 1): Author: leewical@lava.net (LEE R. WICAL); Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 05:53:47 -1000; I placed a sign that sez "DANGER 10,000 OHMS" It seems to work and that they are NOT sure of same! -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Adminis; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00258.html (8,474 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Danger sign paranoia (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:14:06 EST; The best one yet!!! That should throw the curve at the lawyers! Fine print should say: At the tips of elements. Yuri exposed to extreme RF and still around to tell about it "Welcome to RF Fields" --; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00261.html (7,365 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Danger sign paranoia (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:55:56 -0800 (PST); I agree - posting a "radiation" sign is like putting a notice in the paper that you have stopped beating your children. No one understands anything about radiation except that it is BAD and causes al; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00265.html (9,965 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Danger sign paranoia (score: 1): Author: cdietz@swbell.net (Logan); Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:23:54 -0600; "Keep Out - U.S.Government Licensed Radio Facility" Chuck, W5PR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00268.html (9,431 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]