Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Defective\s+Rohn\s+tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Defective\s+Rohn\s+tower\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Defective Rohn tower (score: 1): Author: shane@eatel.net (Shane Dugas); Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 05:18:45 -0500 (CDT); Has anyone ever had an experienced a defective tower section. I purchased a BAS25G top section about a month ago and I finally got around to messing with it yesterday when I realized that it was real; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00155.html (8,512 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Defective Rohn tower (score: 1): Author: W4EF@pacbell.net (Michael Tope); Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 16:18:28 -0700; Shane, Funny you should mention this, I got one from Texas Towers on Tuesday - similar story. I haven't checked the squareness of the legs, but in my case the accessory shelf is out of parallel about; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00160.html (9,779 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Defective Rohn tower (score: 1): Author: baycock@hiwaay.net (Bill Aycock); Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 08:52:21 -0500; With a part this defective, I would think TT should make good on the shipping as well, and bill it on to Rohn. Bill- W4BSG SNIP SNIP - Bill Aycock -- Persimmon Hill Woodville, Alabama, US 35776 (in t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00162.html (8,319 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Defective Rohn tower (score: 1): Author: k5na@texas.net (Richard L. King); Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 14:43:48; Rohn Tower quality seems to have suffered a lot over the past few years. Last fall I received thirty-nine 45G tower sections that were shipped direct from the factory. Of those thirty-nine tower sect; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00163.html (8,945 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Defective ROHN TOWER (score: 1): Author: gjerning@centurion.flash.net (Arne Gjerning); Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 19:54:42 -0700; Just a comment about the OFTEN blamed QC. 1. Consumers can NOT afford to purchase items which have been inspected 100%. 2. QC inspection adds no value to any item. 3. Sampling inspection (Ref: MIL-ST; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00167.html (8,548 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Defective Rohn tower (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (thompson@mindspring.com); Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 19:11:53 -0400; Tichard K5NA had this to say about Rohn: Tri-EX made the T-15 and T-20 in the eighties. These could be used for 25 and 45 replacements. And 15" versus 12.5" and 20" versus 18". They were priced at Ro; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00175.html (8,362 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Defective ROHN TOWER (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 17:37:31 -0600; I'd have to disagree with this. Your product is more valuable if your QC is known to be good enough to catch mistakes in production. The value of your product drops tremendously if you can't assure i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00176.html (8,057 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Defective Rohn tower (score: 1): Author: no6x@inreach.com (Mike Nash, ND6A); Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 23:25:59 -0700; Still do make them and they are much more reasonable in price than the Rohn! Almost bought the T15, but opted to use what I had available and buy the C31XR instead. Mike...ND6A -- FAQ on WWW: http:/; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00182.html (8,243 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Defective Rohn tower (score: 1): Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com); Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 11:01:24 -0400; It was my understanding that Rohn sued an/or bought out a lot of the competition over the past 30 years or so. Another source, particularly one that would mate with 25/45 would be nice. Maybe made in; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00192.html (9,825 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]