Interesting discussion. My tower is10 ft from my detached garage which is about 100 ft from the house. The garage has an underground power feeder from the house service panel which is about 230 ft aw
On 10/18/17 7:11 PM, Shawn Donley wrote: Interesting discussion. My tower is10 ft from my detached garage which is about 100 ft from the house. The garage has an underground power feeder from the hou
On 10/19/2017 6:49 AM, jimlux wrote: In your case, one could put a 1:1 transformer at the remote building, primary side fed from the house, secondary side feeding your subpanel, where neutral and gro
On 10/19/17 11:20 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On 10/19/2017 6:49 AM, jimlux wrote: In your case, one could put a 1:1 transformer at the remote building, primary side fed from the house, secondary side feedi
Or computer networking/terminals with old coax based ethernet, twinax (shielded, twisted pair "coax"), etc. There are simply too many systems that use shielded cables to ignore their impact when loo
< Without the transformer but with ground carried between <buildings, a panelboard and earth ground are still required in the <second building but neutral and ground MUST NOT be bonded in that panel.
NEC has ALWAYS prohibited more than one neutral to ground bond in a system, and has always required earth electrodes for every building. As you noted earlier, the addition of a transformer establishe
NEC has ALWAYS prohibited more than one neutral to ground bond in a system, and has always required earth electrodes for every building. As you noted earlier, the addition of a transformer establishe
NEC is written from the standpoint of protecting people, not necessarily equipment. Granted, more often than not, when it comes to grounding/bonding, what's good for protecting people is usually als