Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding of cables to tower? (N3AE)

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding of cables to tower? (N3AE)
From: Shawn Donley <n3ae@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Shawn Donley <n3ae@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 22:11:57 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Interesting discussion.  My tower is10 ft from my detached garage which is 
about 100 ft from the house.  The garage has an underground power feeder from 
the house service panel which is about 230 ft away on the opposite side of the 
house.  I had to have an electrical permit and inspection thanks to the 800 
section of NEC.   The inspector insisted on two things:


1.  The ground and neutral in the garage sub-panel could NOT be tied together 
in that sub-panel.  Grounding conductor in the feeder bonds the sub-panel to 
the house service panel.


2.  The tower had to be bonded to the ground bar in the garage sub-panel.


The garage sub-panel Is bonded to a ground rod just outside the garage and I 
bonded the tower to that ground rod with solid #4, which satisfied the 
inspector.   The feeder from the house does include a grounding conductor which 
is bonded to the garage sub-panel as well as the house service panel grounding 
bar.


The tower also has a radial grounding system with (currently) about seven 8 ft 
ground rods plus a Ufer using the base rebar bonded to the tower anchor bolts.


So...my tower is bonded to my electrical service “ground” which is 235 ft away 
from the tower, and through a wire which partially runs through the house 
basement before going underground.   At RF frequencies, I doubt that the tower 
is really bonded to the house service panel....DC yes, RF no.  Not saying this 
is the proper or best technical solution but it appears to be the requirement 
around here to pass electrical inspection for a tower.


I’ve debated running a separate bare #4 or #2 underground from the tower to the 
house service panel with a few ground rods along the way, but it seems to me 
that would create a big loop that could inductively pick up currents from a 
nearby strike and only make things worse. 


I wrote about this a couple of years ago in TowerTalk but the thread quickly 
re-focused only on #1 above.


N3AE
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>