Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Insurance\s+for\s+Tower\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth Goodwin" <krgoodwin@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:36:15 -0600
Jim has hit the nail on the head. Another area that all of the major insurance carriers departed from after Hurricane Ike was the Texas coast (one mile from any body of water was the State Farm cance
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00482.html (11,674 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Smallhouse <w7cs@theriver.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:02:32 -0700
Here in Oracle AZ, we have been listed as the most vulnerable communitiy in NA, as far as Wild Fire danger. It's not a matter of "If but When". Our terrain, altitude and foliage is almost identical t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00486.html (9,888 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:22:58 -0500
On 11/28/2013 11:36 AM, Kenneth Goodwin wrote: Jim has hit the nail on the head. Another area that all of the major insurance carriers departed from after Hurricane Ike was the Texas coast (one mile
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00490.html (13,081 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: Mickey Baker <fishflorida@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:36:16 -0500
Of course. The reasoning behind naming everything isn't for science. The minor storm names are recirculated... Very much a public relations issue. More storms are named now than ever before. I'm cert
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00491.html (9,376 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: Charles Gallo <charlie@thegallos.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:43:40 -0500
The national weather service and the us govt refuses to recognize the names the weather channel assigns, explicitly. _______________________________________________ __________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00492.html (9,911 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: Mickey Baker <fishflorida@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:04:07 -0500
NOAA defers to WMO for the names. http://www.wmo.int/pages/mediacentre/factsheet/factsheetstormnaming_en.html -- Mickey Baker, N4MB Fort Lauderdale, FL *Tell me, and I will listen. Show me, and I wil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00493.html (9,038 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 01:05:44 -0500
Yes, but you notice that none of the above name WINTER storms. The LIST of names comes from WMO, but in reality, the names are assigned by the Tropical Weather Center of NOAA -- -- Charlie www.baysid
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00494.html (9,317 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 02:54:03 -0500
The Govt is actually showing some rationality? I really dislike the Micky Mouse approach to naming winter storms. 73 Roger (K8RI) On Nov 28, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Mickey Baker <fishflorida@gmail.com> wr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00495.html (10,647 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 06:37:15 -0800
On 11/28/13 7:22 PM, Roger (K8RI) on TT wrote: On 11/28/2013 11:36 AM, Kenneth Goodwin wrote: Jim has hit the nail on the head. Another area that all of the major insurance carriers departed from aft
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00496.html (9,685 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:53:16 -0500 (EST)
Although I may be covered with my homeowners policy, I will not ever make a claim for any damage to my antennas. I have Marsh for any damage that may result to them from wind etc. I have a bunch of a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00497.html (12,658 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:01:41 -0800
On 11/29/13 7:53 AM, Cqtestk4xs@aol.com wrote: Although I may be covered with my homeowners policy, I will not ever make a claim for any damage to my antennas. I have Marsh for any damage that may re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00498.html (9,598 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:50:47 -0500 (EST)
Howdy, TowerTalkians -- Some interesting info in this seldom discussed topic but I think we'll head back to TOWER TALK. Tnx. Cheers, Steve K7LXC PS - Hope everyone had a nice Tnxgiving! _____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00506.html (6,440 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:40:39 -0500
The 10% structure coverage is usually on a standard homeowners policy, you can increase this limit if you wish. I have not seen a policy specifically state ham radio tower, but this should not be nec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00513.html (9,726 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Insurance for Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Giacobello, K2XX" <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 12:04:47 -0500
I have had very positive experiences on recovering ham radio losses with insurers in both NJ and VA. I have had a full replacement rider for radio related losses on my home owners' insurance for arou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00010.html (12,698 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 34
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu