Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Log\s+Periodic\s+Beam\s+Performance\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Beam Performance (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:34:57 -0500
I'd appreciate hearing of experience with LP beams, especially performance vs number of elements. The little T6 spec's are remarkably similar to the T10, but some experienced people are pretty adaman
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00121.html (7,030 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Beam Performance (score: 1)
Author: "Dino Darling" <dino@kx6d.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:30:16 -0700
While we are waiting for the much desired replies, can people leave out the "why do you want a log" comments?! There are as many reasons why people want a log as why they choose a tri-band over a mon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00123.html (11,189 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Beam Performance (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:50:21 -0500
Dino, that's a great bunch of links. I'll get on 'em as xmas duties allow. Reason for log is simple. I want to try WARC and with LP I get that AND the old bands AND no traps. I'm 68 and hope to only
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00124.html (11,995 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Beam Performance (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Eisinger" <eisinger@q.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:23:55 -0700
I'll second the statement that a log at 70' won't come in second very often...I have just that...an M2 7/10-30 Mhz log at 70' with an Alpha 87A driving it....I chose that particular antenna as it giv
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00125.html (12,137 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Beam Performance (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:04:47 -0500
Hi Wilson - A few comments on LPs - I designed (electrical and mechanical), and have in service, a fairly large 7-60 Mhz LP. 15 elements on a 46 foot boom. The four lowest frequency elements are 45 f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00127.html (11,031 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Beam Performance (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:49:39 -0600
Back in the mid '90s I assembled a Tennadyne (http://www.tennadyne.com/) log for NJ5S SK in Enid, OK (I forget the exact model). I spent the Saturday afternoon of the CQ WW SSB contest of '95 buildin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00132.html (8,748 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] log periodic beam performance (score: 1)
Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:17:33 -0500
I'd appreciate hearing of experience with LP beams, especially performance vs number of elements. The little T6 spec's are remarkably similar to the T10, but some experienced people are pretty adaman
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00134.html (10,884 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu