<Charlie, <Would you please share a link to a source that discusses the limits of N <connectors?? Everything I have seen so far suggests they have as good or <better power handling at low frequencies
Jim: The wireless industry is starting to use another connector -- the 4.3/10 DIN. Much more robust than the Type N, but unlike the 7/16 DIN, it is sized for greater connector density for feed-lines
Mike you are right. There is a push to go with the smaller DIN's. I came across a bunch of Suhner 4.3/10 DIN adapters and only wish I had a use for them since these things are really beautiful, very
a lot higher than a Type N. Type N uses a puny center pin, identical to a BNC. Actually not - .120" (N) vs 0.053" (BNC) - you're looking at that tapered guide pin, but that's not the current carrying
On 6/26/2018 7:31 AM, Michael Clarson wrote: The wireless industry is starting to use another connector -- the 4.3/10 DIN. Much more robust than the Type N, but unlike the 7/16 DIN, it is sized for g
While one can argue as to the absolute need for a DIN vs. other connector type, I'm pretty sure that everyone who has used DIN will confirm - a DIN is a vedddddyyyyy great connector. I hate N connect
Actually not - .120" (N) vs 0.053" (BNC) - you're looking at that tapered guide pin, but that's not the current carrying part. The center pin Uh.. Current in the center conductor is equal to the curr
If the center pin of the male N connector is not aligned lengthwise in the connector body, that's due to using the wrong kind of male clamp N connector (such as a UG-21 type). Use the UG-1185 type (A
On 6/26/18 10:49 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On 6/26/2018 7:31 AM, Michael Clarson wrote: The wireless industry is starting to use another connector -- the 4.3/10 DIN. Much more robust than the Type N, but
Use the UG-1185 type (Amphenol 82-312) and this problem would be impossible, as the pin is captivated between two Teflon step washers and is held in fixed position by a ridge on the pin held in preci
Dont fret Jeff! I've worked with professional tower contractors that cant assemble or get an N connector right. BUT with the newer style of Andrew/Comscope series of N connectors with the captive pin
Along with QN and QMA for interior/indoor connections within equipment cabinets. Thanks 73 Jim W7RY --Original Message-- From: Michael Clarson Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 9:31 AM To: Jim Thomson Cc:
Yea no problem also with hardline specifically because the pin is nailed into the plastic. It's 213 + N-type with the simple single-center press-in pin type that I had bad luck with. 73/jeff/ac0c al
<Don?t fret Jeff! <I've worked with professional tower contractors that cant assemble or get an <N connector right. <BUT with the newer style of Andrew/Comscope series of N connectors with the <capti
Is the 4.1-9.5 a new connector. It looks like the chassis jack is the same size as a SO-239 and N which would make an easy swap. I also found a 4.3-10 chassis jack which has a hole pattern close enou
The 4.1-9.5 has been around for 15 years at least, and is the one properly called mini-DIN. The 4.3-10 is much more recent, and was developed specifically with ultra low PIM in mind, plus high densit
I haven't looked, but I'm guessing that neither of the *mini* DIN series have much to choose from as far as connectors for 3/8" braided coax (RG213, LMR400, etc). They were developed to be the next g
Steve Could you layout the typical matrix of connectors from the cell antenna down to what remains of the shed at the bottom.? I heard somewhere that there was a general move afoot to eliminate the f
Thanks 73 Jim W7RY going on for decades now. _______________Whatever.... Type N is good up to about 12 ghz, which is the only thing going for it. 7-16 Dins are good up to 6 ghz.. ____________Because
Could you layout the typical matrix of connectors from the cell antenna down to what remains of the shed at the bottom.? 2G (GSM & TDM) used mostly simple N connector based transmission lines with t