Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Question\s+for\s+crank\s+owners\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:18:13 +0000
Got a question for crank-up owners: Do you crank up your towers only when you are operating, i.e. 95% of the time they are nested and only go up when you turn on the rig and start looking for a qso,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00575.html (8,114 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: Ve6wz_Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:47:40 -0700
Rob: Living on a city lot with a 2 el 80-40m Yagi on the tower makes it best to keep my tower DOWN except when QRV. The neighbors sure appreciate it, and for that matter so do I...to a Ham the Yagi m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00577.html (10,105 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:20:06 -0500
<snip> The short answer? When I come in to operate I expect to turn on the switch and go. When I finish operating in the evening I point the antenna where "I think" the band will be open when I get b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00580.html (8,808 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: Ve6wz_Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:34:05 -0700
Roger... Well ok, I guess that makes some sense. However...I can wait the 4 minutes till its at full height (100'). Truth is, in 2 minutes the tower is at 50 feet and is still "good-to-go" If I'm at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00581.html (9,560 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "RJD" <nj9k@wi.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 04:43:49 -0000
When your 70+ years old "how many times are you going to crank it up or down"?? Or is it just easier to "FLIP" the switch like I do. On the qestion of height or extension, I only raise it 90% and tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00590.html (12,167 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "k0dan" <k0dan@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:33:15 -0600
Rob: Generally, the 72' tower at this QTH is parked just shy of 100%, unless bad WX threatens or we are leaving town.Then it is motored down to around 50% or all the way (about 22' fully tested). Ove
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00591.html (11,548 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "k0dan" <k0dan@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:51:49 -0600
Interesting, never considered speed. This thread is kind of mixing "crank ups" and "motorized", but the feet-per-minute issue still is a factor I've owned hand-crank and motoroized. Don't want to sta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00592.html (11,988 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 02:03:38 -0500
Sounds like an airplane. You either spend a lot of money flying it, or a lot of money fixing it if you let it set. Roger Halstead (K8RI and ARRL 40 year Life Member) N833R - World's oldest Debonair C
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00593.html (13,971 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:06:17 +0100 (CET)
The only times mine comes down is when there's antenna work to be done, or there's plenty of advance warning of major storm conditions. It lived through the 1987 and 1991 storms when the wind speeds
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00594.html (8,425 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: lew <lew@dsl-only.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:28:55 -0800
I've had more crank-ups destroyed than most. Some were operating error and some were Mother Nature smacking me around some. K7LXC has some pix of what happened to a crank-up when a thunder storm cell
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00595.html (11,100 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: Dan Bookwalter <n8dcj@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 05:15:05 -0800 (PST)
My Tx-472 (notice it doesnt say TX-472MDP) stays at full height most of the time. when we are supposed to get big weather or i am going to be out of time for an extended time i will crank it all the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00597.html (11,452 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:37:45 -0800
Not mentioned has been the notion of not leaving a crankup in any one position for longer times. This is supposed to be somewhat harmful to the rope. Without thinking it would be easy to leave it all
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00600.html (8,533 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:33:29 +0000
hi everyone, thaks for all the email about my crank-up questions--i rx so many i may not have time to answer each one individually but tnx vy much all the same. part of my reason for asking is that i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00601.html (10,677 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: Dan Bookwalter <n8dcj@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Rob on the tx-472 and probably most or all US Towers the cable is the only thing standing between a nice looking tower/antenna system and a pile of scrap metal... ____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00603.html (12,501 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Shauger" <rgshauger@myyellowstone.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:41:27 -0800
There is little doubt that crank up towers in the 70-90 foot class require some special maintenance considerations. They are pushing the mechanical design envelope by their shear weight and potential
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00604.html (13,623 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "Dusty Chapman" <k3wc@bellatlantic.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:32:37 -0500
The same can be said for my guyed tower. Rob on the tx-472 and probably most or all US Towers the cable is the only thing standing between a nice looking tower/antenna system and a pile of scrap meta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00606.html (12,947 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Harris" <mike.harris@horizon.co.fk>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:16:36 -0300
G'day folks, 40' to Is and mechanism I have a two section 12 metre Heavy Duty "Versatower" made by Francis and Lewis in the UK. On this there is a butch steel flap on the first section that is lifted
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00607.html (9,946 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck Frame" <n6psn@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:59:35 -0800
No, It is the brake winch.Speaking from experience. The system was 2 years old. Worm gear only from now on. N6PSN -- Original Message -- From: "Dan Bookwalter" <n8dcj@yahoo.com> To: "Rob Atkinson, K5
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00614.html (13,120 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:50:28 -0600
As with every guyed tower. Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone. _______________________________________________ ______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00618.html (9,203 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Question for crank owners (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:02:47 +0000
K5UJ asked about crank-ups. I have a Hills two-section roughly 50-footer. Once extended, one climbs to top of bottom section to pin the two together with one bolt on each of the three faces. It is gu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00619.html (8,495 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu