- 1. [TowerTalk] Questions Please? (score: 1)
- Author: DavidC" <eDoc@netzero.net (DavidC)
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 00:21:03 -0400
- A discussion has been raging on the TowerTalk Ham Internet reflector about Log Periodics versus Yagi antennas. I have tried to press for more fact than smoke but lack some of the hard facts I need to
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00105.html (10,294 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Questions Please? (score: 1)
- Author: lsica@visi.com (Louis Sica, Jr.)
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 06:47:39 -0500
- We may be into another "Apples Vs Oranges" debate here If we're into similar boom length comparisons, it should be C3S Vs. T6, and C3 Vs. T8. The T10 has a 24 foot boom Since Force 12's in CA, and Te
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00109.html (8,330 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Questions Please? (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 10:05:10 -0400
- Strictly speaking, the boom-length/gain relationship is for parasitic antennas only, but as a practicalmatter I agree that size, weight, and wind loading are important parameters for getting into app
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00110.html (9,449 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Questions Please? (score: 1)
- Author: DavidC" <eDoc@netzero.net (DavidC)
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 10:29:42 -0400
- and Aww, close enough! ;-) OK, let's just look at those four. Fewer variables is always easier for me! way You mean you doubt that they can estimate (or report field tests from owners) in an environ
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00111.html (10,414 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu