Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+\[Tower\s+Talk\]\s+160m\s+inverted\s+L\s+now\s+up\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\:\s+\[Tower\s+Talk\]\s+160m\s+inverted\s+L\s+now\s+up\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] 160m inverted L now up (score: 1): Author: "Tod - ID" <tao@skypoint.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 18:24:44 -0600; Jerry: I posted a copy of an interesting article from a Ham Radio issue in May of 1985 on my web site (www.k0to.us) . Page down to the page that has links to PDF files. Look for the "160 meter Transm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00184.html (8,236 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] 160m inverted L now up (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:46:38 -0500; Tod I did download this info but haven't had a chance (gotta work) to digest the math yet. From first look it appears as though one would have to keep it low to the ground due to the maximum height a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00187.html (9,674 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] 160m inverted L now up (score: 1): Author: <mahlonhaunschild@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:52:14 -0500; <whine> This is why I miss Ham Radio magazine so much. Each and every issue was chock-full of Stuff You Can Use. Gonna buy me a set of the CD-ROMs just as soon as I save up my pennies. </whine> regar; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00201.html (8,624 bytes)
4. RE: [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] 160m inverted L now up (score: 1): Author: "Tod - ID" <tao@skypoint.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:02:14 -0600; I want to assure you that it was worth every cent to get the CD ROM set from ARRL. I do have an almost complete set of HR (missing maybe one or two initial issues), I have promised that to another ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00204.html (11,303 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]