Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RFI\s+resolution\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RFI\s+resolution\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: "David Cook" <davec@netdave.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 22:49:27 -0700; This may be a bit off topic for the TT group, my apologies if so. Please let me know where the most appropriate forum for this question would be. I've got a problem with RFI'ing one of my neighbors.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00624.html (7,790 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:41:59 -0700; Hi David 1. Post your question to rfi@contesting.com 2. Recognize that you are dealing with a woman with a princess complex who will never be satisfied no matter what you do. 3. Document all dealings; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00625.html (9,604 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: John Silberman <blkcat28@atlantic.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 10:21:48 -0400; David, Send her a letter explaining what is happening, you need letters for proof. Phone calls do not cut it. The letter should state that you run a clean station, it's more than likely an overload d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00626.html (10,897 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 11:35:48 EDT; Since you mentioned your antenna, maybe this is a blank check for a towertalk subject- Can you explain more details about the antenna set up and feedlines etc???????? First, check everything at the s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00630.html (9,637 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: "Floyd Sense" <sentek@sprintmail.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:10:55 -0400; If I were you, I'd send her a nice letter offering your assistance in resolving her problem. That will be of some benefit to you when you have to answer the complaint she will file with the FCC. It's; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00631.html (10,465 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@pivot.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:04:04 -0400; In my opinion you are putting yourself in a very precarious position whenever you go into someone's house and attempt to "fix" their RFI problem. It leaves you open to all manner of charges that you; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00633.html (7,919 bytes)
7. RE: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: "David Cook" <davec@netdave.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:51:11 -0700; Thanks Roger, that's seems like very good advice to me. My neighbor doesn't care to have me in her house "inspecting" her home, and I don't particularly want to see it either. Who knows, maybe Norman; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00636.html (10,742 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:20:13 -0700; Regarding your EMI susceptible subwoofer... I assume it has no digital parts working at more than 9kHz clock speed, etc, so it''s not required to meet Part 15? (although, it's possible that any consu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00639.html (12,775 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:30:50 -0700; doesn't particularly Since you're not paying, you could refer her to the yellow pages, etc. (Don't want her claiming you referred her to a "shill"...) It's a bunch o'bucks, and it's not necessarily; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00640.html (10,320 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:41:16 -0700; To keep the discussion relevant to this list, it sounds like it is related to the field strength, so you obviously need a taller tower to put her house further away from the beam (and further down th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00641.html (12,430 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:57:39 -0500; I am wondering if there is a separate "amp" for the subwoofer that is picking up the signal and it could be grounded or shielded. I had a preamp for the cable TV to boost the signal for 5 TV connecti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00655.html (10,526 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] RFI resolution (score: 1): Author: Tom Anderson <ww5l@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:10:38 -0500; Jim: Several years ago at the request of the Dallas FCC Field Office I headed a team of Dallas/Fort Worth hams who participated in a neighborhood RFI problem investigation reportedly involving a ham; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00656.html (15,095 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]