Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ROHN\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ROHN\s*$/: 71 ]

Total 71 documents matching your query.

21. [Towertalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com (Cqtestk4xs@aol.com); Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:32:40 EST; I guess I am responsible for the political crap that has come forth as a result of my posting detail about Rohn having some difficult times right now. When I made my original posting on this topic, I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00257.html (7,788 bytes)
22. [Towertalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: k3bz@arrl.net (Jerry Keller); Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:06:36 -0500; Bill ... you're not the one who started it, maybe I am. I had the audacity to disagree with the few elitists that had nothing good to say about MFJ. Of course those are the same guys who don't think; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00258.html (8,885 bytes)
23. [Towertalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: jljarvis@adelphia.net (jljarvis); Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 08:09:28 -0400; Based on their QST ads, and the discontinuation of the foldover product, it was my belief that Rohn had adopted a 'harvest-withdraw' strategy for the amateur market. Not displaying would be consisten; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00558.html (6,397 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:22:25 EST; As Rohn workers ended their shifts Wednesday, they passed an electronic sign flashing "Merry Christmas and the Happiest of New Years." Only hours before, they had learned their jobs would soon evapor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00338.html (7,402 bytes)
25. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Al Toothaker" <n6ta@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:29:36 -0800; Do we thank NAFTA for this one? As Rohn workers ended their shifts Wednesday, they passed an electronic sign flashing "Merry Christmas and the Happiest of New Years." Only hours before, they had lear; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00340.html (9,217 bytes)
26. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "tom.dixon" <tom.dixon@xtra.co.nz>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:43:41 +1300; NAFTA is what or who Tom Dixon zl2hgr@xtra.co.nz Do we thank NAFTA for this one? As Rohn workers ended their shifts Wednesday, they passed an electronic sign flashing "Merry Christmas and the Happies; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00341.html (10,158 bytes)
27. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:52:12 -0000; No, we thank unions. BTW, for the fellow that asked, NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00342.html (10,443 bytes)
28. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Al Toothaker" <n6ta@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:00:06 -0800; NAFTA: North American Free Trade Agreement. Somewhat controversial in parts of the US as it is blamed for a lot of product manufacturing to be transferred to lower labor cost areas, especially south; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00343.html (11,875 bytes)
29. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:57:04 -0700; No - we "thank" management. They make the ultimate decisions. Joe WD0M Colonel, USAF (Ret) At 06:52 PM 12/12/2003, Barry wrote: No, we thank unions. BTW, for the fellow that asked, NAFTA is the North; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00344.html (8,417 bytes)
30. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "wd5iok" <wd5iok@email.msn.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:06:50 -0600; No, we thank unions. BTW, for the fellow that asked, NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00345.html (12,243 bytes)
31. Fw: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:10:51 -0500; in priced any _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00346.html (10,003 bytes)
32. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: BobK8IA@aol.com; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:08:49 EST; Precisely.....we thank their own bid preparation team. In the past 7 yrs they have lost nearly every major governmental system bid to Pirod. I was one of the consultants on a large (183 towers...big; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00347.html (8,288 bytes)
33. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "tom.dixon" <tom.dixon@xtra.co.nz>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:18:31 +1300; Of course you thank the unions....that is why you have holidays, sick leave and work 8 hour shifts....not because your boss wants to give you those conditions....because he has to... unions fought lo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00348.html (12,656 bytes)
34. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Conrad Nasatka" <conco@paonline.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:40:32 -0500; We were told a long time ago..don't you remember... but the liberals kept pushing...remember the conservatives said" that loud sucking sound you hear will be the loss of jobs, then to Mexico and now; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00351.html (11,727 bytes)
35. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:58:27 -0500; UTTER ROT! The last time I checked there were TWO parties in this country and NO major trade bills go into effect without signatures from BOTH sides. Besides which, this rant has absolutely NO place; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00352.html (9,696 bytes)
36. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "rdanyluk" <rdanyluk@telus.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:58:20 -0800; Isn't it strange that many Canadians have the same thoughts and experiences about NAFTA - 'loud sucking sound' of jobs gone south. Don't blame the Canucks - our wages up here are too high. As discuss; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00353.html (13,380 bytes)
37. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Bob Puharic" <wf3h@ptd.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 04:56:03 -0000; THis is off topic...BUT since the subject is up... It was George Bush Sr. who started the push for NAFTA, not Clinton. The deal was pretty much done when Clinton came on the scene, and to renege woul; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00354.html (14,891 bytes)
38. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:02:53 -0800; Despite the opinions expressed here, are Rohn-like products going to live on? Will they be manufactured again? I've missed that on the reflector... 73. Steve, KZ9G Email: kz9g@arrl.net --Original Mes; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00355.html (11,013 bytes)
39. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stover <rkstover@mchsi.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 00:05:34 -0600; "And it was a REPUBLICAN CONGRESS...which Clinton worked with, that gave approval to NAFTA...that includes the Republican congress Bush worked with when he was president." This is factually incorrect; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00357.html (8,744 bytes)
40. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1): Author: "S. J. Blackwell" <w5lu@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:24:11 +0000; NAFTA had nothing to do with the company going broke. An earlier post stated that the company that took them over had an asbestos liability, lost the lawsuit and gave up the Rohn division as settleme; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00358.html (9,141 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]