Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Radials\s*$/: 78 ]

Total 78 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: wa3afs@inav.net; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:00:26 -0400; I have used old coax for radials. at the connection point to the vertical, I short the inner conductor to the shield. Works great. I have experiemented with using different types of wire for radials; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00615.html (8,364 bytes)
42. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "mryan001" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:51:29 -0500; Bruce, I have seen others write about using various sizes (gauges) of wire for radials. From what I have read and seen larger conductors appear to be a waste. Very small gauge wire is as good within; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00617.html (9,498 bytes)
43. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: wa3afs@inav.net; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:35:14 -0400; I have seen many 'posts' about the size of the radials. But, I stand behind my results at 3 different QTHs (two in NY, one in Iowa). I count results as being able to consistently work DX! The only su; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00620.html (12,516 bytes)
44. [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:56:16 +0000; <<<Hello All, has anyone ever used old RG213 coax as radials. If so what were the results ?>>> 213 will work I guess, but its diameter would make it harder to shove into a crack in the soil or if you; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00623.html (8,201 bytes)
45. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:49:19 -0400; I've done extensive experimentation with radials on vertical antennas on 160 meters during the past 18 years. Back in 2001 a MF broadcast engineer friend of mine using professional broadcast measurin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00627.html (9,271 bytes)
46. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Barrie Smith" <barrie@centric.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:56:43 -0700; This chat about radials reminds me of a long, well maintained road, well up in the mountains, I walked up several years ago. At the end of the road, and at the top of the mountain, I came upon an ins; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00629.html (8,587 bytes)
47. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "mryan001" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:07:55 -0500; Tom, Your comments have been relayed on several website that discuss the radials under inverted the " L " for 160. Also on the Butternut site they say that the radials should AT LEAST be as long as t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00633.html (11,685 bytes)
48. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:10:21 -0400; Lee your post is dripping with sarcasm, there is no need for it. - -... ...- -, Thomas F. Giella, KN4LF Lakeland, FL, USA kn4lf@earthlink.net KN4LF SWL & Amateur Radio Autobiography: http://www.kn4lf; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00634.html (10,363 bytes)
49. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:53:58 -0700; Any ice and/or snow and/or wind in the area? Could be that the size is chosen for mechanical purposes. (or, that it's a "standard installation" desiged for such, and installed everywhere.. wire cost; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00640.html (10,739 bytes)
50. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 09:29:04 -0500; With elevated radials operating at 180 kHz, the radials were probably a form of Litz wire, a multi-strand wire that has each strand insulated from the other. Such wire is necessary to get low loss at; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00645.html (11,626 bytes)
51. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 09:31:01 -0700; On the contrary. It makes exactly the point that I would have made had I taken the time to respond, and in words I would have been pleased at having put together. The only significant characteristics; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00646.html (9,187 bytes)
52. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com; Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:18:24 -0400; ""Yes - some configurations work better than others, but anything works better than nothing."" Yep. Any antenna in the air is better than any antenna that's only on paper. Cheers John K5MO __________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00067.html (6,950 bytes)
53. [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "James Bloomfield" <rn23crna@windstream.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:53:54 -0400; In the planning stage for my 90 foot insulated Rohn 25 I am at the planning for radial stage. Everyone knows the current price of copper. I plan to have 120 1/4 wave radials. Two questions. Can I use; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01015.html (6,563 bytes)
54. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Dubovsky, George" <George.Dubovsky@andrew.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:01:00 -0400; You can, but you are really putting down just steel wire. The copper is the thinnest of flashes, just enough to keep the steel wire from oxidizing in protected environments. It won't survive outside; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01016.html (9,432 bytes)
55. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:34:00 -0400; Very true! I do a fair amount of MIG welding and the wire has a short spool life if left inside an unprotected garage. I can imagine instant rust outside. Carl KM1H __________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01018.html (10,371 bytes)
56. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:29:32 -0700; True, and galvanized electric fence wire won't last much longer. I put a bunch of it under a 40 meter vertical and it turned into a bunch of rust in a few years. 73 Tom W7WHY ________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01052.html (7,592 bytes)
57. [TowerTalk] radials (score: 1): Author: greenacres113@aol.com; Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:35:19 -0500; Anything above 2 will make it a better antenna. I agree exact length isn't important.Up to a point the more the better.?You can bend them too. Zig Zag if necessary to go around things. A driveway tri; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00236.html (6,543 bytes)
58. [TowerTalk] radials (score: 1): Author: k4fj@aol.com; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:18:16 -0400; I am planning a 160M vertical with radials.? I am looking for a device that will attach to my tractor's 3 point hitch and cut a narrow and shallow slit in the ground.? I know Verizon using something; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00216.html (7,324 bytes)
59. Re: [TowerTalk] radials (score: 1): Author: Dan <n5ar@air-pipe.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:35:00 -0700; Steve: I just gave a PPT presentation for our club called "Antenna Hints and Kinks" In that are pictures and discussion of an attachment I built for plowing in radials plus much more I originally mou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00225.html (9,649 bytes)
60. Re: [TowerTalk] radials (score: 1): Author: Dan <n5ar@air-pipe.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:00:43 -0700; p.s. If anyone wants to use this PPT for a club program you are welcome to. I would strongly recommend that you use a laser pointer as I did to high lite the item in the picture being discussed. The; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00227.html (11,462 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]