Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+4\s+square\s+or\s+yagi\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+4\s+square\s+or\s+yagi\s+\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: 4 square or yagi ?? (score: 1): Author: JEH@on.mobile.telia.se (Jan-Erik Holm); Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 07:45:58 GMT+1; Something doesnt seem right here. I figure that a 4 SQ and a 2 LY should have about the same gain and at 140 ft they should have about the same wave angle. So what would make up for the huge differe; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00597.html (8,641 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: 4 square or yagi ?? (score: 1): Author: kurscj@oampc12.csg.mot.com (Chad Kurszewski WE9V); Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 12:37:48 -0500; Modeling with AO, a 2 el (fullsize elements) on a 40' boom at 100' has 4.5dB more gain than a "W1CF" 4 square. If you use linear loading, unless something is wrong, it won't have 4.5dB of loss. A 40; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00611.html (8,075 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: 4 square or yagi ?? (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 14:00:57 -0400 (EDT); Sounds good until you watch it free wheeling in the wind. Sounds good until you have fixed your linear loading wires for umpth time. Sounds good until you have replaced the rotor 3 times and finally; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00613.html (7,827 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]