Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Slipp\-Nott\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Slipp\-Nott\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: K5rr@aol.com; Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 14:20:03 EDT; If the Slipp-Nott device is really effective in preventing mast slippage, are not the same forces due to wind placed upon the rotor gears as when the mast is "pinned"? Dick, K5RR ** See what's free a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00418.html (6,302 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:11:13 -0400; I asked the same question. A fellow from Tennadyne explained that if the wind load is high enough, the Slipp-Nott will in fact slip before the guts of the rotor are torn up. I guess that's a believab; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00424.html (9,011 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: "Jim Spears" <n1nk@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:36:10 -0400; When I was using T2X, I used a Slipp-Nott to clamp the mast to the rotor. It never slipped but I did have other problems with the T2X (went through 3, all with broken brakes) and replaced it with a Y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00070.html (6,863 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:59:14 -0700; Jim, I have a T2X and so far no problems other than the brake sticking syndrome where you briefly have to turn it to the opposite direction for a tad then turn back. I understand this is common with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00072.html (8,068 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: dave arruzza <w1ctn@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:07:31 -0800 (PST); To all... I have a Tennadyne T10 that recently has started to slip on the mast. No matter how much I tighten the clamps slippage eventually returns and then I am off the bearing the rotor displays. T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00348.html (7,506 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: Richard Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:50:56 -0800; Tennadyne markets the Slipp-Nott. Does anyone on the reflector have real world experience using this item. Does it really work? 73 Dave W1CTN Radio Ansonia The concept of Slipp-Nott seems good until; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00349.html (7,774 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:45:49 -0500; The T10 is not a huge antenna, it should not slip on the mast. Rather than put a band aid on it, I would look and the mounting plate and clamping. Is the plate strong enough or is it bending? What ty; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00350.html (7,768 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: "K0DAN" <k0dan@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:29:40 -0600; I have a T10 on a nominal 2" mast. It has been up since around 1999. It was put up before SlippNott was available. I am in Kansas City area, subject to weird WX including occasional ice loading and h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00352.html (10,063 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: "Hector Garcia,XE2K" <j_hector_garcia@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:46:28 -0800 (PST); 2 things Your mast is not real 2 IN OD or become too smooth and there is not grip where the Slipp Not make his work move the antenna higher or lower in the mast to avoid that place where is slippi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00353.html (8,987 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: N7KA@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 04:07:47 +0000 (UTC); I think many folks are missing a very easy fix (modification) to many antennas that have poor boom to mast mounts. I have a 52ft boom 5el 20M yagi (its heavy, about 170lbs) made from 2ea TELREX 3el 2; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00354.html (9,069 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 23:43:58 -0500; On 12/19/2013 8:50 PM, Richard Karlquist wrote: On 2013-12-19 13:07, dave arruzza wrote: To all... I have a Tennadyne T10 that recently has started to slip on the mast. No matter how much I tighten t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00355.html (14,576 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 23:53:41 -0500; I agree with Arne. A pair of the Hy-Gain mounts would be the easiest approach. Most metal shops will have Al plate up to an inch thick, or more. Unfortunately it's not as cheap as surplus. 73 Roger (; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00356.html (7,785 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: "Hector Garcia,XE2K" <j_hector_garcia@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:00:01 -0800 (PST); Arne Agree with you, those Hy gain clamps are great not sure if they can be a direct installation in this tennadyne, but using 2 pairs with a aluminum will be killer adding a aluminum plate to sit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00357.html (11,552 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:32:28 -0500; Brilliant idea using Hy-Gain clamps. They do clamp well but unfortunately the maximum mast size I think is 2 1/2 diameter. I use 3/8 or 1/2 aluminum plate, which is readily available cut to size at m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00358.html (9,163 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:18:17 -0600; Tennadyne markets the Slipp-Nott. 73 Dave W1CTN I had one and I had a very bad experience with it. When the mast slips in the rotor but not in the Slipp-Nott sleeve, the resulting forces are transmit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00359.html (8,469 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:15:05 -0500; 73 Dave W1CTN I had one and I had a very bad experience with it. When the mast slips in the rotor but not in the Slipp-Nott sleeve, the resulting forces are transmitted through the Slipp-Nott bracke; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00360.html (11,584 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:18:25 -0500; The T10 boom is not that long however I imagine that the log periodic in not balanced as well as a conventional yagi. Even with some extra torque from imbalance it not be that difficult to make a mas; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00361.html (12,143 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:59:24 -0500; I thought they were powder coated. Al AB2ZY ________________________________________ From: TowerTalk [towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of john@kk9a.com [john@kk9a.com] Sent: Friday, Decemb; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00362.html (13,098 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:16:41 -0500; There is no powder coat on the units shown in their pictures. http://www.tennadyne.com/slipp_nott.htm Al AB2ZY ________________________________________ From: TowerTalk [towertalk-bounces@contesting.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00363.html (9,340 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: "K0DAN" <k0dan@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:20:34 -0600; Actually the T10 is quite well balanced (weight wise!) at the center, and being light weight it quite easy to manage on the tower. The boom length is, I think, 28' and the longest elements are around; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00364.html (14,057 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]