Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Smaller\s+tribander\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Smaller\s+tribander\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:07:28 -0600; Hi all Putting up a 48' tower at the cottage this summer. Looking for suggestions on smaller, but not micro (MA5B, etc) tribander to put up. I have ZERO interest in WARC bands. Also, would the expert; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00259.html (7,402 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: Barry Gross <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:40:27 +0000; The F12 C3S (25lbs on 12ft boom) does a great job. If you do put up that 40m dipole at 50ft, I'm willing to bet that it will often outperform the vertical. 73, Barry N1EU ____________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00260.html (7,874 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <nwtcc@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:23:49 -0600; I like the Force 12 XR-5. I have two in a stack. Single feedline and you get good performance on 12/17M. Works for me. Also you might consider the Skyhawk. 73, Jamie WB4YDL Hi all Putting up a 48' to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00261.html (8,092 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:20:06 -0500; Kelly: I'm not sure of what you mean by "small." However, someonse else suggested you look into a Bencher Skyhawk. I have had mine up on my tower since 2001 and have posted several times recommending; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00263.html (9,273 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: "Barrie Smith" <barrie@centric.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:42:19 -0700; I actually put up the Skyhawk on AD3F's recomendation, plus reading the information on Bencher's website. I have no frame of reference, since this was my first HF beam, ever. It doesn't play as my qu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00264.html (11,023 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 09:39:05 EST; suggestions on smaller, but not micro (MA5B, etc) tribander to put up. You should probably check out our tribander comparison report (by N0AX and K7LXC). It's available from _www.championradio.com_ (; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00265.html (8,338 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: Bud Kozloff <W1NSK@Hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:45:27 -0800; I have had a Cushcraft A4S up at 60' for many years. Never a problem and always a solid performer. Took it down once when I moved and replaced trap caps etc. Back up for 7 years and works flawlessly.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00273.html (7,606 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:38:53 -0500; You have already received a number of responses to your post - most seemed to suggest using either F12 or Bencher antennas with full sized interlaced elements, which are not really "small". I have us; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00292.html (8,776 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: "K0DAN" <k0dan@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:46:13 -0600; And alternatively Tennadyne T6 log periodic: $500, 20-10 meters inclusive (including WARC, and some users have had good results on 6M), 12' boom, weighs 37 pounds. 5+ dbd gain, 6+ sq. ft. wind load.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00293.html (9,931 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: "Peter Dougherty" <w2irt@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:09:15 -0500; Another option I can recommend is a TGM mini-beam. I use one of these at only 25' AGL every year for CQWW-CW in Toronto and I'm very pleased with its performance. Small, lightweight and with a tiny f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00294.html (8,878 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:26:46 -0500; And don't forget, you don't have to worry about "tunning" an LP. If you can live with 2:1 SWR and the turning radius, considering the price and mechanical and electrical spec's, and the fact that it; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00298.html (10,697 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: "Frosty" <frosty1@pdq.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:03:32 -0600; I would vote for the Tennadyne T6 also. The SWR on the last T6 I used in Botswana was 1.3:1 across all bands. One coax for 20 through 10 meters. It will also work on 6 meters. No ATU required. The bo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00299.html (12,258 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: navydude1962@yahoo.com; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:24:05 +0000; I vote for a 2 ele steppir. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry I would vote for the Tennadyne T6 also. The SWR on the last T6 I used in Botswana was 1.3:1 across all bands. One coax for 20 thro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00300.html (13,139 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:12:49 -0500; I think you'll find that ANY antenna works better in Botswana than in the US, qso-wise... -Rex K1HI Rex Lint Merrimack, NH WWW.QRZ.COM/db/k1hi I would vote for the Tennadyne T6 also. Th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00301.html (12,939 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander (score: 1): Author: "Frosty" <frosty1@pdq.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:51:57 -0600; Well if that is the case why were signals so poor from some of the last DXpeditions? Yes the location more rarer the better the signal report. Charles F. Frost Frosty K5LBU frosty1@pdq.net I think yo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00302.html (13,258 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]