Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TX\-455\s+versus\s+LM\-354\s+tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TX\-455\s+versus\s+LM\-354\s+tower\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] TX-455 versus LM-354 tower (score: 1): Author: Gary Slagel <gdslagel@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:16:26 -0800 (PST); Looking at the specs for the Universal Towers TX-455 versus the Tashijian LM-354 tower they are very similar. Same height, same weight, etc. However the LM-354 is rated at 23 sqft load at 85mph while; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00509.html (9,406 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] TX-455 versus LM-354 tower (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:47:36 -0500; Tashjian as adopted the new standard for wind load that specifies peak wind speed (gusts). US Tower is still using the older "60 second average" wind ratings. If I recall correctly, the 85 MPH gust r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00510.html (10,550 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] TX-455 versus LM-354 tower (score: 1): Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:24:58 -0800; Check out the basic strength of the steel used for the two towers. Several years ago, before Tashjian took over the sale of the Triex line, the steel used was changed and claimed to be considerably s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00511.html (11,666 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] TX-455 versus LM-354 tower (score: 1): Author: Gary Slagel <gdslagel@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:15:40 -0800 (PST); Thanks Joe, Your comment inspired me to look for 'peak wind speed' in the archives and I found this interesting thread which includes a couple interesting links: http://lists.contesting.com/archives/; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00512.html (12,383 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] TX-455 versus LM-354 tower (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:18:32 EST; versus the Tashijian LM-354 tower they are very similar. Same height, same weight, etc. However the LM-354 is rated at 23 sqft load at 85mph while the TX-455 is rated at only 12.3 sqft at 70mph. high; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00513.html (8,549 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] TX-455 versus LM-354 tower (score: 1): Author: KJ6Y@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:33:13 EST; The LM-354 top section is 13 7/8 inches wide. The TX-455 top section is 12 inches wide. These towers are probably comparable. I've installed and worked on both, and consider both to be excellent towe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00514.html (7,252 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] TX-455 versus LM-354 tower (score: 1): Author: Gary Slagel <gdslagel@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:06:24 -0800 (PST); Thanks guys, I got a note from Gary Smith at US Towers saying their calculations come from UBC 97 code. Looking that up I found the UBC 97 code refers to the 'fastest mile' reference. So... the TX-45; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00522.html (11,055 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]