Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Telrex\s+40\s+M\s+Beam\s+restoration\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Telrex\s+40\s+M\s+Beam\s+restoration\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Telrex 40 M Beam restoration (score: 1): Author: ckepus@calweb.com (Chris Kepus); Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 10:57:09 -0800; I am in the process of restoring a Telrex 40M329 beam. I would like to contact anyone with experience with this beam and especially someone who is still using this fine antenna. Also I am interested; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00202.html (7,912 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Telrex 40 M Beam restoration (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:52:20 -0500; Hi Chris, I have a 40M346 or whatever the long boom 40 meter antenna is. You really need to check some things on that antenna, if it is anything like mine. Telrex used two types of elements. The piec; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00213.html (9,905 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Telrex 40 M Beam restoration (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 23:04:32 -0800; Tom/Chris, Do either of your Telerex 40 meter beams have solid rod stainless steel element tips? Dean Scarborough, KS8S used to have two 40M329 stacked at 90' and 180'. As I recall, he had a problem; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00214.html (11,699 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Telrex 40 M Beam restoration (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 20:32:02 -0500; Mine has hollow aluminum. The element weighs enough as it is! 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@contesting.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administra; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00218.html (8,168 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Telrex 40 M Beam restoration (score: 1): Author: billwall@bellsouth.net (bill wall); Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 01:50:22 -0500; Hi all; I have a Telrex 40M346 serial # 70402 and it has hollow tips. The boom broke just at the splice joint. I am now repairing this. Tom is right about element weight. The insulators through boom; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00220.html (9,400 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Telrex 40 M Beam restoration (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 08:57:18 -0800; Hey Bill, I don't know why they chose to use solid tips on that antenna. I still remember being surprised to learn that when we got the antenna off the tower, as I had never seen that sort of design; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00221.html (10,794 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Telrex 40 M Beam restoration (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 09:08:57 -0800; Hi Chris, Don't lose heart over my comments. Even if the 40M329 has some weakpoints, I suspect that between some computer optimization work with the dimensions and some mechanical modifications to th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00223.html (15,004 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Telrex 40 M Beam restoration (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:35:49 -0500; Hi All, This thread fits perfectly with the radials over the beach thread, and the Hex beam gain. It fits with the B&W dipole and GAP vertical stuff also. The quad fits in, as do the bad opinions abo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00236.html (10,341 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Telrex 40 M Beam restoration (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 03:22:28 -0800; I want to love my 80 meter dipole at 27 feet, but it doesn't seem to get the message, especially on 80 meter longpath. As they say, you can't fool mother nature. Perhaps I should have qualified my co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00247.html (12,742 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]