Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+VNA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+VNA\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] VNA (score: 1): Author: Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H <ea1ddo@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 13:54:40 +0000; I guess; For bench work only, used with PC, VNWA is best option actually. For bench AND field use (no PC needed), KC901S+ is best and more completed. It is like a VNWA with battery and screen, up to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00570.html (9,540 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] VNA (score: 1): Author: Jeff Draughn <n0ost99@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:06:40 +0000; Ditto on the Rig Expert AA-230ZOOM! I used MFJ for years but the 230 is much better portable as well as Shack. Good Luck! Jeff, N0OST _______________________________________________ _________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00571.html (11,119 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] VNA (score: 1): Author: Norm n3ykf <normanlizeth@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:04:51 -0400; Bought an Anritsu S113b on the bay. Total with new battery, OSL cal kit and charger was less than $500. Uses a serial port/null modem for pc data. 517 data points. Loads of bells and whistles I.E.: a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00572.html (12,957 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] VNA (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:17:10 -0700; <I second Jim's remarks about the VNWA 3E (and Dan's, AC6LA, software).? I use mine in the field with a 10" touch screen tablet computer (Motion) running, uck, Windows 10.? Not quite as friendly as a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00573.html (8,700 bytes)
25. Re: [TowerTalk] VNA (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:38:41 -0400; my inverted-l.? As long as I start a sweep at 1.7 MHz or above I have no issue with them." I have a nearby 50KW AMBC station a few miles to the south of my remote site. With the Array 2180 and N2PK; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00574.html (8,897 bytes)
26. Re: [TowerTalk] VNA (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:44:37 -0700; there's a fair number of older HP VNAs (875x and similar) in the kilobuck range on eBay - I guess if you don't mind the large mass, and the CRT is in decent shape AND you have a way to get .s2p file; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00575.html (9,620 bytes)
27. Re: [TowerTalk] VNA (score: 1): Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:00:43 -0700; I have no knowledge of MFJ equipment. With a real vector analyzer, calibrated with OSL standards, I would expect that the effects of any filtering could be mitigated, although dynamic range and possi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00583.html (9,554 bytes)
28. Re: [TowerTalk] VNA (score: 1): Author: "Jeff" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:36:28 -0500; To the gentlemen's question, if you are not near a BC station and the use is primarly outside, the 259 is really a good box. But it really depends on your intended application and importantly if you; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00584.html (10,717 bytes)
29. Re: [TowerTalk] VNA (score: 1): Author: <k4pwo@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 19:32:03 -0500; And then there is the Austin QRP groups "VIA" VNA that can be a 2-port or simple 1-port analyzer (builder's choice) that will set you back less about $200 with options. http://www.qsl.net/k5bcq/Kits/; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00585.html (10,653 bytes)
30. Re: [TowerTalk] VNA (score: 1): Author: Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H <ea1ddo@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 10:36:35 +0000; Norm, I am actually selling one of those VNA Master; https://www.ebay.com/itm/222672633655 73, Maximo Bought an Anritsu S113b on the bay. Total with new battery, OSL cal kit and charger was less than; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00003.html (13,154 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]