Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+comparison\s+question\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: "John G." <af5cc@fidmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:56:55 -0500
How do the "radialless" verticals, like the R5, R7000, MA5V, Gap ones, compare in performance to the standard 1/4 wave verticals that are roof mounted with radials? Does one tend to outperform the ot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00040.html (7,347 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: "John G." <af5cc@fidmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 22:15:59 -0500
That brings up another issue I have wondered about. I know that monoband yagis outperform tribanders because they have the proper element spacing, where a tribander is a compromise in terms of elemen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00041.html (9,464 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: Dan Hearn <n5ardxcc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 20:12:27 -0700
Triband Yagis also suffer due to losses in their traps as do trapped verticals. A 1/4 wave vertical with a good radial system is hard to beat as a simple DX antenna. There are trapless multiband Yagi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00042.html (11,662 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: "John G." <af5cc@fidmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 23:17:32 -0500
Hi Dan How lossy are traps really? I have seen so many diffrent figures on how bad they are or aren't 73 John AF5CC Triband Yagis also suffer due to losses in their traps as do trapped verticals. A 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00043.html (10,999 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 23:47:56 -0400
I used the Hy-gain AV640 at the legal limit with good luck. Ifound the R-5 (which is the predecessor to the AV640 to be a royal PITA which is about as straight forward as I can be. I worked a lot of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00044.html (8,265 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 20:59:48 -0700
My GAP Titan (I think their first model) didn't hear or talk well. It's hung in the barn, covered with bird crap. It does make a good bird perch. $150 OBO, located in the close in east foothills of S
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00045.html (9,446 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 23:11:24 -0700
Hi Dan How lossy are traps really? I have seen so many diffrent figures on how bad they are or aren't 73 John AF5CC w out on cw. A buddy had a TA-33 jr... thay went screwy one day..so we took it down
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00047.html (9,668 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 00:49:11 -0700
Several years ago I had an R5 on top of my flat roof house in Scottsdale. It was horrible. It was so bad that I opened up the box at the base to see what was in there, and after seeing the pathetic l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00048.html (9,624 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:07:05 -0400
Those who have heard my 80/40/WARC signals may be aware that I am using an insulated tower vertical (photo on qrz.com). This antenna on 40m is a 1/2-wave vertical. Estimates of feedpoint impedance ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00049.html (10,323 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Schaaf" <dan-schaaf@att.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 07:26:16 -0400
For what it's worth : I designed and built a multiband tower vertical for 40, 60, 80 and 160. Last night I worked VK9CZ Cocos Keeling, 11,000 miles on 40 CW. It is 1/2 wavelength on 40, 1/4 wave on 6
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00050.html (12,038 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:54:31 -0500
I have a Hy-Gain Hy-Tower of '1950's design originally intended as a 5 band antenna (predated WARC bands.) It has been improved (more stainless) and you can add on a 17 meter stub. It works 12m just
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00055.html (10,682 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical comparison question (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <r-emails@n5ot.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 06:04:55 -0500
Thanks for posting this Patrick. It has been a long time since I read a review of a Hy-Tower and they continue to just play and play for many owners. 73 - Mark, N5OT I have a Hy-Gain Hy-Tower of '195
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00056.html (11,780 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu