Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Why\s+did\s+adding\s+a\s+radial\s+make\s+the\s+input\s+Z\s+of\s+myinverted\s+L\s+go\s+\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Why did adding a radial make the input Z of myinverted L go ... (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:47:43 EST
73 de Jim Smith VE7FO<< Rather than analyzing your particular situation (more info needed), here are some general observations: 1. If you have strong local BC or other signals, some antenna analyzer
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00279.html (10,150 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Why did adding a radial make the input Z of myinverted L go ... (score: 1)
Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:26:39 -0800 (PST)
I am not an expert in these matters, but I can give you my experience this past fall. I have an Inverted-L going up the tower 60 feet and then over to a tree at around 132 feet. I used a grid-dip met
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00282.html (9,340 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Why did adding a radial make the input Z of myinverted L go ... (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 02:15:05 -0800
Hey guys, thanks for taking the time to formulate these responses. Yuri - 1. Yes, everyone has been telling me that the BCI is messing up my measurements. 2. Yep, aware of that. Where is K7GCO? Haven
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00323.html (10,353 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Why did adding a radial make the input Z of myinverted L go ... (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:58:13 EST
variable C in series so I could resonate the antenna anywhere in the band. Maybe even motorize it. From what you say, maybe the MkV tuner will be good enough.<< That is good way to get more out of lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00324.html (8,356 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu