Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+guyed\s+tower\s+reference\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+guyed\s+tower\s+reference\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: k1nu@k1nu.com (Leonard Kay); Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 07:33:20 -0400; Hi people, I'm currently in the process of getting my building permit at my new QTH and have run across a small snag. My building commissioner wants to see some evidence that guyed towers crumple whe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00093.html (8,612 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 06:46:34 -0600; Crumpling may apply to VERY TALL towers like the 1000 footers used by TV stations under SOME conditions. I've NEVER seen it happen to Rohn Ham towers. When the guys or guy anchors fail, THEY FALL OVE; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00095.html (11,217 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: SavageBR@aol.com (SavageBR@aol.com); Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 08:10:03 EDT; Hi Len The only document and data I have found is a letter written to a Mr. Richard Ramirez at WHCT-TV in Hartford, CT. by Mr. Gunnar Olsen, Jr., P.A.,P.E. I obtained my copy from Tower Tech, PO Box; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00096.html (9,135 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 08:28:19 -0400; Does it have to be burst? If you were to separate the anchors for the top guys from those for the other 2 sets, you could then demonstrate that a single guy failure can only produce one of two scenar; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00097.html (10,299 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: ag0n@arrl.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 07:30:33 -0600; Those are interesting numbers. I didn't know they existed. However, I would have to say that they cover the only one I have had direct exposure to. In that case, the 1500' tower folded itself into a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00098.html (9,380 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: ag0n@arrl.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 07:34:31 -0600; Again, I'm no structural engineer, but I would think that falling straight out would be indication of an abnormal situation. It seems that if it were properly guyed (with proper strength guys at each; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00099.html (10,019 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: k5na@texas.net (Richard L. King); Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 14:32:45 +0000; This may be likely if the tower has only one ground anchor point on each leg. If you were to use two guy points on each corner of the tower, then the tower would likely crumple instead of falling fla; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00102.html (13,136 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 10:24:25 -0600; I have personal knowledge of several ham tower fall-overs where the towers fell their full length. Case 1 120 - 140 ft of Rohn 25 and several antennas in suburban back yard. Tower fell over with ante; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00103.html (13,024 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 10:12:43 -0600; I have personal knowledge of several ham tower fall-overs where the towers fell their full length. Case 1 120 - 140 ft of Rohn 25 and several antennas in suburban back yard. Tower fell over with ante; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00104.html (13,915 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK); Date: 6 Aug 2001 08:48:42 -0700; Hi Len, A couple of comments: 1) Here is a reference to a study of tower failures due to icing which is one of the common causes for tower failure here in the northeast (and elsewhere): Atmospheric I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00105.html (12,343 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: W9IXX@arrl.net (Philip Florig); Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 16:28:41 -0500; Hi all, Just by sheer accident I happen to be looking at an old copy of "The DX Magazine" in the "reading room" and in the June 1989 issue there is an article called "Broken Bolt Ranch" written by St; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00113.html (10,235 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: W9IXX@arrl.net (Philip Florig); Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 17:11:35 -0500; Hi, This will be one of those good points to remember. Going along with this, a question has come up. The Rohn Catalog for 25g shows only single point bottom guy support up to 170ft. If you wanted to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00118.html (9,962 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: rthorne@tcac.net (Richard Thorne); Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 17:39:39 -0500; I would say 80% of the tower height where the highest guy for that anchor point will be attached. I.E. for 25g guyed at 30 and 60 feet put the anchor point at 48 feet, for 90 and 120 foot level guys; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00119.html (11,412 bytes)
14. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 23:48:44 +0000; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hello Phil Here is a better one. The guy specs for Rohn 25 for 70, 90, and 100 mph wind speeds are the same. Same distance from the tower same guy spacing and the same; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00123.html (9,916 bytes)
15. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 18:48:20 -0600; For 90 and 130 ft towers, I put my first anchor at 60 ft with guys at 30 and 60 ft. This gives me a 20 ft turning radius at the 40 ft level which is where I like to place my lower antennas. The secon; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00126.html (10,142 bytes)
16. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: n0tt1@juno.com (n0tt1@juno.com); Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 03:17:41 +0100; Hi Phil, The answer is in the angle of the guy as referenced to level ground. IMHO the angle between ground the the guy should *never* exceed 60 degrees. The optimum practical angle would be 45 degr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00132.html (9,343 bytes)
17. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: Tower2sell@aol.com (Tower2sell@aol.com); Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 18:10:08 EDT; FYI, The weak spot for a 25G is the diagonal brace just above the the top guy wire. This is for ROHN catalog installations. The "design" failure point is when the daigonal brace buckles (wind speed m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00260.html (9,584 bytes)
18. [TowerTalk] guyed tower reference? (score: 1): Author: Tower2sell@aol.com (Tower2sell@aol.com); Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 18:25:54 EDT; The answer is simple - it can be where ever your engineer designs it for. Deviating for the catalog requires a new engineering design. Tower2sell@aol.com List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00262.html (8,754 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]