Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+moto\-yaesu\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+moto\-yaesu\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] moto-yaesu (score: 1): Author: "Vic" <wb4slm@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 22:56:26 -0500; Regarding Moto - Yaesu -- Not so much a tower subject but nonetheless topical -- Motherolla is into commercial radio, not VFO controlled ham gear -- my guess is they will let it die out -- I doubt Mo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00142.html (8,036 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] moto-yaesu (score: 1): Author: Jeff Carter <towertalk@hidden-valley.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 23:13:45 -0500; It's possible, as you say, but historically haven't some of the Motorola engineers been hams? I always thought this was the reason that so many ways to move Motorola gear to the ham bands were releas; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00143.html (9,236 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] moto-yaesu (score: 1): Author: "David Jordan" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 10:47:32 -0500; I don't think the acquisition is about ham radio...its more likely to be about VERTEX becoming viable competition to Motorola...Vertex hardware is a bit less than half the price of MOTO. If VERTEX ac; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00152.html (8,161 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]