Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+I\s+need\s+to\s+be\s+louder\s+on\s+40\s+and\s+80\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+I\s+need\s+to\s+be\s+louder\s+on\s+40\s+and\s+80\.\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] I need to be louder on 40 and 80. (score: 1): Author: hurl8957@uidaho.edu (Chris Hurlbut); Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 21:42:42 -0800; Hi everyone, Maybe some of you can help me out. I'm looking to improve the 40 and 80 meter signal here at the University of Idaho, W7UQ. Right now the antenna is a ladder line fed inverted vee wire o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00728.html (9,790 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] I need to be louder on 40 and 80. (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net (Don Havlicek); Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:18:27 -0500; Comments inserted below: This should be your LAST choice .. you want domestic QSO's .. the prime angles of radiation from this antenna would be better for DX. This would work .. but be very time cons; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00729.html (12,155 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] I need to be louder on 40 and 80. (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:08:09 -0600; The SIMPLE solution for 80M is an inverted vee under the TH7. If you feed with ladderline, you can also use this on 40M. You may want to supplement this with lower dipoles (50 ft) for close-in covera; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00731.html (18,479 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] I need to be louder on 40 and 80. (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:42:38 -0500; If you have a "random wire from a high structure, I would suggest a popular antenna from the 60's: Cut it to 133' and insulate the rest. Depending on the convenience, break the 133' 49 feet from eith; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00733.html (12,085 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] I need to be louder on 40 and 80. (score: 1): Author: schiers@netins.net (hasan schiers); Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:52:51 -0600; As I recall, when you use the inverted V configuration in either two half waves in phase or a double extended zepp, you do not end up realizing the gain at productive angles that you would expect fro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00736.html (22,596 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]