Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+IS\s+Boom\s+length\s+the\s+HOLY\s+GRAIL\s+\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: xppq@pyramid.net (xppq)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:03:13 -0800
Below in a communication from CHUCK at Tennadyne I am soon to install a T 620 - his is a 6 el LOG YAGI for 20m only ( = discontinued model) on 27 foot boom - it has 4 el in LOG cell, and director and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00362.html (10,006 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 23:26:06 -0600
I totally question the veracity of anyone that claims a cubical quad with the exact same dimensions as a yagi has more gain. It's just not true. Force 12 dispels this myth on their website. 73, Jon N
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00366.html (11,932 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 08:26:05 -0600
Not exactly. Having just read the piece on the F12 Web site about quads and yagis, Tom points in a rather circumspect manner to some unnamed research. He does correctly point out that the flaw in com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00372.html (15,689 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: billwall@eyecon-solutions.com (Bill Wall)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 07:51:02 -0500
Hi Jon; Consider the full wave Quad has about 1.8 db more gain than a 1/2 wave Yagi. The Quad is quieter on receive and does not hear rain static. The efficiency of the average 3 el Quad is in the 90
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00382.html (14,293 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (k4oj)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:41:48 -0500
where is this from? a given, while I have never done a side by side this is an agreed upon benefit og the quad sez who? sez who?? I assume these are based on the above presumptions ...uh oh - time to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00384.html (9,670 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 09:47:09 -1000
It was written: Really? Then will the yagi elements sag from the tremendous heat build up within them? Never have seen that. Do they glow a dull red at night; would very soon after 500 watts was bein
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00385.html (9,153 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 15:24:37 -0500
Seems like I recall that an erstwhile towertalk regular reported a few years ago testing a KT-34XA trap in a homemade calorimeter to measure the loss actually dissipated as heat. The number he came u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00388.html (9,258 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 12:34:02 -0800
You can actually model the conductor losses in a Yagi (or quad for that matter) using NEC. You will find that the difference between aluminum tubing and a perfect conductor is typically a very small
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00390.html (17,160 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: k3bz@arrl.net (Jerry Keller)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:14:21 -0500
Yeah, but a yagi looks like a big TV antenna...a quad looks much, much more cool... Jerry K3BZ You can actually model the conductor losses in a Yagi (or quad for that matter) using NEC. You will find
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00391.html (18,046 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:40:44 -0800
In his 2 volume pair of books on Quads, Cebik shows that Quad efficiency can be improved significantly by using 1/2 inch tubing conductors. He looked at accomplishing the same improvement by using 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00392.html (19,578 bytes)

11. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 18:06:14 -0600
HUH? The stacking gain for two *straight* half wave elements spaced 1/4 WL (the spacing of a square loop) is 1.0 dB as shown in the ARRL Antenna Book. Turn the ends towards each other and the gain dr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00395.html (10,633 bytes)

12. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: kk9a@arrl.net (kk9a@arrl.net)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:19:18 -0000
AO shows my 6el monobanders to be 98.9% efficient. Where does this 50% number come from? John Hi Jon; Consider the full wave Quad has about 1.8 db more gain than a 1/2 wave Yagi. The Quad is quieter
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00397.html (9,407 bytes)

13. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:56:56 +0100
You forgot the only real advantage of a 2 elements quad over a 2 elements yagi, a better F/B. All the rest about gain, efficiency and take off angle is a pure mith, just like when an antenna manufact
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00398.html (9,171 bytes)

14. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: billwall@eyecon-solutions.com (Bill Wall)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 15:12:31 -0500
Hi All: I knew I would draw a few tough critics on tower talk. I do not have a 33 million dollar test range. All of my testing is hands on comparisons. I just moved to another location and all of my
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00401.html (12,398 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu