Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+deed\s+restrictions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+deed\s+restrictions\s*$/: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: n8fgv@amsat.org (Dan Schultz); Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:16:14 -0400; In many cases the deed restrictions and covenants are imposed on the developer by his bank as a condition for getting financing for the subdivision project. Perhaps we need to talk to bankers also. M; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00961.html (7,576 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: kb9mci@qsl.net (Bryan Fields); Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:54:23 -0500; I look at it the situation from the point of view that who should have the right to say you need permision or a license to modify your property. The reason any government will not stand up to these t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00967.html (7,361 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: k1my@msn.com (Bruce Makas); Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:50:47 -0700; To further add ammunition to those who believe that CC&R's can be pre empted, the Arizona Legislature passed yesterday a bill that states that CC&R's cannot prohibit the display of flags (means flagp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00971.html (8,836 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE); Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:43:50 -0700; There is another thing coming, and depending upon the explanation might harm Hams. The tall tower!! There is a place in the south coast of BC that allow a company to replace the tower with another on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00995.html (8,904 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: ww5l@gte.net (Tom Anderson); Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:12:47 -0600; Fellow tower talk members: A ham friend of mine and his XYL in the Houston TX area live in a deed restricted area which prohibits outside antennas without approval of the subdivision's architectural; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00207.html (7,290 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 23:18:05 EST; a Two things you need: 1) the new tower regulations book by K1VR (available from all ARRL dealers) and 2) a subscription to the ham-law reflector - This list is for discussion and does not purport to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00259.html (8,596 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:04:55 -0800 (PST); I've had legal fights with cities, counties, and deed restrictions over antennas. I've been in court over this more than once. The method of enforcement of CC&R's is a lawsuit (at least in California; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00300.html (12,370 bytes)
8. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:50:00 -0500; Generally, the Homeowner's Association is entitled to immediate injunctive relief, pending the outcome of the case if a complaint is filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. Know what you agreed; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00302.html (9,373 bytes)
9. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary Ferdinand W2CS); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:04:35 -0500; <SNIP> One pitfall to the last sentence: In fact DSS dishes ARE OK. They are specifically permitted by a premptive FCC ruling. See http://www.fcc.gov. Lots of very specific words there that make no; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00304.html (11,514 bytes)
10. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:05:07 -0800 (PST); Paul, Good comments. Is there anything that one could write on the CC&R's that might negate certain portions of the CC&R's. For instance, if I write just above my signature something to the effect th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00305.html (10,504 bytes)
11. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:07:05 -0800 (PST); The farm is the preferred solution!! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00306.html (12,700 bytes)
12. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@firstinter.net (Stu Greene); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:21:53 -0700; Michael -- this question belongs on the Ham-Law reflector. E-mail to ham-law-request@altlaw.com Good Luck Stu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00307.html (8,426 bytes)
13. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:29:14 -0500; Of course, the best solution is to remove the applicable language altogether. Unfortunately, most, if not all developers will not negotiate the terms of the CC&R provisions. I do know of two cases wh; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00308.html (12,389 bytes)
14. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: k6sdw@hotmail.com (Eddy Avila); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 22:43:29 +0000; YES....JUST SAY NO (AND HELL NO) TO CC&R'S!!! We did....good luck and 73.......I hope you prevail! /k6sdw To: <towertalk@contesting.com> ______________________________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00309.html (11,999 bytes)
15. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: k6sdw@hotmail.com (Eddy Avila); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 22:53:01 +0000; Another serious concern...most CC&R's I've read stipulate if you lose the lawsuit, you pay all court costs and Assocation attorney fees which can get really costly!! S I G H!!! /k6sdw To: <towertalk@; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00310.html (12,671 bytes)
16. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:08:49 -0800 (PST); Good info, Gary. The fact that the FCC passed this law for a commercial venture and won't do so for ham radio certainly demonstrates the economic imperative that is at work in Washington these days.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00311.html (13,604 bytes)
17. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@firstinter.net (Stu Greene); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:14:17 -0700; yes, Ed. The information for joining is below. E-mail to ham-law-request@altlaw.com and place the word >subscribe< The Ham Law List is operated by a lawyer, and many lawyers who also are hams are act; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00312.html (9,127 bytes)
18. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:18:14 -0800 (PST); Yes, it might be a good question for that reflector. But I was asking one particular guy who seems knowledgable and who had just opined on this list about this topic. I did not pose it as a general q; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00313.html (9,456 bytes)
19. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:23:52 -0800 (PST); Thanks, Paul. I did something like that once too. However, I bought the FIRST house in a small subdivision of 12 homes. I knew the developer was keen to get the first one sold (to get the pump primed; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00314.html (13,980 bytes)
20. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:28:27 -0800 (PST); How many people here on this list have actually been sued by a homeowner's association? Is this concern real in a legal sense but not terribly probable? Or have there been lots of such actions agains; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00315.html (14,423 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]