Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+guying\s+tolerance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+guying\s+tolerance\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] guying tolerance (score: 1): Author: n8ku@longwire.com (Larry D); Date: 22 Oct 2002 20:09:14 -0400; As I try to lay out possible guy anchor locations,I wonder, exactly how much "leeway" do I have for The angle with respect to each other? (nominal 120 degrees) The distance between anchors and tower?; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00718.html (7,720 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] guying tolerance (score: 1): Author: Mark <AA6DX@pacbell.net> (Mark); Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:55:53 -0700; That is like asking "HOW HIGH IS UP?" ... actually, this is called AMATEUR RADIO, so, within reason, go for it .. I have never had a problem with falling down tower(s) from using the 50% rule, and th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00719.html (8,935 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] guying tolerance (score: 1): Author: n1lo@hotmail.com (Mark .); Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:18:17 -0400; Larry asked: << As I try to lay out possible guy anchor locations,I wonder, exactly how much "leeway" do I have for The angle with respect to each other? (nominal 120 degrees) The distance between an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00732.html (10,746 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] guying tolerance (score: 1): Author: richard@karlquist.com (Richard Karlquist); Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 21:45:14 -0700; What I do to get accurate layout the easy way is to use TWO tape measures simultaneously, with the zero ends of the tape measures going to existing points, and the far ends crossing over at the right; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00745.html (13,571 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] guying tolerance (score: 1): Author: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos); Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:36:39 +0000; Don't have the Rohn catalog in the office so I'm not sure, but I *believe* the specs state the guys need to be 120 degrees apart +/- 5 degree. Or at least, in one catalog from Rohn, they specified so; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00749.html (7,749 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] guying tolerance (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:06:51 -0400; This reminds me of an episode when we were putting up my tower -- the backhoe digging for one of the guy anchors hit an unmapped corner of the septic field. This was not going to work ... so I had hi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00751.html (8,269 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] guying tolerance (score: 1): Author: n1lo@hotmail.com (Mark .); Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:31:23 -0400; <<What I do to get accurate layout the easy way is to use TWO tape measures simultaneously, with the zero ends of the tape measures going to existing points, and the far ends crossing over at the rig; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00752.html (8,174 bytes)
8. [Towertalk] guying tolerance (score: 1): Author: nielsen@oz.net (Bob Nielsen); Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:56:19 -0700; The key consideration is that the vector sum of the horizontal forces on the tower from the guys is zero, so one will end up with unequal tension in the guys. The use of a tension gauge such as the o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00753.html (8,017 bytes)
9. [Towertalk] guying tolerance (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:20:59 -0700; I did a pretty good search for the specs Rohn might give on the angle between adjacent guys and could not find anything specific. I did find the angle expressed as the following, however: "120 degree; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00779.html (8,561 bytes)
10. [Towertalk] guying tolerance (score: 1): Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt & Carrie Trott); Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:07:20 -0700; I meant to reply to this thread sooner. I have been studying the subject again as I prepare to stack up some 25G. Rohn drawing A810214R6 is titled "Foundation and Anchor Tolerances," has the followin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00780.html (8,432 bytes)
11. [Towertalk] guying tolerance (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:09:05 -0800; It seems obvious to me that giving a "Anchor Alignment Spec" of 0.1 degrees makes it close to impossible to comply with Rohn's recommendations. Is this Rohn's "escape clause" where they escape all re; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00848.html (9,145 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]