Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+suggestion\s+for\s+ERP\-based\s+Entry\s+Classes\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1)
Author: "Hoffman, Mark" <mhoffman@microwavedata.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:14:04 -0500
So, what you are saying is... Since i'm a microwave-head, I live in the fabled northeastern USA, and because of that, I'm killing VHF contesting experiences for everyone else. Kewl. Mark, K2AXX Yeah
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00055.html (9,588 bytes)

22. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:22:20 -0600 (CST)
Why don't you get some microwave gear? Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/v
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00056.html (8,578 bytes)

23. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1)
Author: "David Hinton" <ke4yyd@gtcom.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:55:27 -0500
Zack and others, I don't get microwave gear for several reasons, limited budget, poor health, etc. I live in a rather remote area as far as weak signal operators are concerned and find much difficul
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00058.html (9,272 bytes)

24. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1)
Author: "Mike A. King - KM0T" <scsueepe@mtcnet.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:55:56 -0600
are designed part I agree...there was very little microwave activity here in Iowa, so I got some gear. Guess what, I almost won the June VHF contest in SOHP a few times. Who says the east coast cant
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00059.html (10,557 bytes)

25. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:24:45 -0800 (PST)
There isn't a lot in southern WI either, but it is on my road map to get on to some of them soon. Why? Because there are guys like Mike who are already on those bands. EN13 should be quite workable f
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00060.html (10,930 bytes)

26. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gilmore - W4SHG" <shg@staffnet.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:10:31 -0500
I agree with Mike King on this matter whole-heartedly. This business of building or attempting to build support for some sort of EIRP classification will result in mass confusion both for a scoring p
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00061.html (11,395 bytes)

27. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Wendling" <kb1eaa@berkshire.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:13:00 -0500
Wow this got a bit out of hand. All I suggested in the beginning was to have the same catagories for rovers as for other stations. A limited catagory and a low and high power catagory. Nothing really
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00062.html (10,338 bytes)

28. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:49:20 -0500
It's about making the categories more meaningful (see my previous email that shows how flawed the present power-only system is). A secondary benefit is that of assuring one's system is as tuned up as
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00068.html (11,606 bytes)

29. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:12:05 -0500
Considering 8-watts of 3456 energy into 448 elements is certainly a LOT of ERP, then I'd say that one deserves to be categorized HP. On the other hand, if one wanted to be categorized LP, then simply
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00070.html (10,828 bytes)

30. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1)
Author: wbr wf4r <wbr@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:58:50 -0500
VHF, et all, I've been reading this thread with great interest because I believe there needs to be some changes in how the reporting is done in QST. I think that it is very obvious that those in the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00089.html (11,250 bytes)

31. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:47:58 -0600 (CST)
The more I think about it, the more complicated it gets. Has anyone mentioned path loss yet? Path losses skyrocket as you go up the bands. An ERP of a megawatt on 10368 MHz isn't going to do you any
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00092.html (11,999 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu