Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+CQ\-VHF\s+Rule\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+CQ\-VHF\s+Rule\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] CQ-VHF Rule (score: 1): Author: "John Lindholm" <w1xx@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:34:11 -0400; There seems to be more ink devoted to the "connected by wires" rule for CQWW VHF than it's worth. But let's address the subject. First, the rule pre-dates my taking over directorship of the contest.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00153.html (8,965 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ-VHF Rule (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:54:10 -0500 (CDT); I find that amazingly forward-thinking! We didn't have the technology we have today to bring that off. Also, we've been having discussions on the cq-contest reflector about the same subject on HF. I; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00154.html (9,995 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ-VHF Rule (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:46:25 -0700 (PDT); A breath of fresh air, John! Thank you for taking the time to address this issue publicly. Also, thanks a TON for the certificate! I'm honored with a #1 All Band New York and saddened that I'll miss; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00162.html (8,216 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ-VHF Rule (score: 1): Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <dmcintyre@att.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:34:51 -0400; I personally do not have a situation where this rule would be a problem. Even when using a "flyswatter" on the microwave bands the actual antenna is still connected to the transmitter. The flyswatter; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00163.html (7,965 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]