Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FM\s+Contesting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FM\s+Contesting\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FM contesting (score: 1): Author: "Michael A. Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:30:40 -0500 (CDT); I've tried to stir up contesting activity in the Houston & S/E TX and even posted this guide on my web-site http://www.ka5cvh.com/vhf/contest.htm I'd appreciate comments. Mike Urich, KA5CVH www.ka5cv; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00101.html (6,925 bytes)
2. RE: [VHFcontesting] FM contesting (score: 1): Author: "Hoffman, Mark" <mhoffman@microwavedata.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:12:34 -0400; Mike, The Rochester, NY area has always had a large FM-only participation level. There is one station (well-equipped for 6m - 1296MHz FM only) who routinely scores 10K, and makes a few hundred QSOs d; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00113.html (8,901 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] FM Contesting (score: 1): Author: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:09:56 -0600; We normally monitor FM frequencies and pick up a few points during the contests too--but I'd really like to see more leadership from ARRL on this front. For this new category to be successful, I thin; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-12/msg00015.html (8,634 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] FM contesting (score: 1): Author: Rick R <rick1ds@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:15:08 +0000; There was an excellent presentation on use of FM in VHF Contesting at the Mid-Atlantic States VHF Conference in October. The presenter operated only 4 band FM from his vehicle parked on a high spot (; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00034.html (7,678 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM contesting (score: 1): Author: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 05:16:31 +0000; Hi Rick, I've been meaning to grab a copy of the proceedings from that, if only for the talks on light contacts. I agree that 222 FM is the most productive of the FM bands normally, for a while K1SIG; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-11/msg00039.html (9,431 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]