Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Poll\s+Almost\s+Closed\.\.\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Poll Almost Closed... (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
If you haven't shared your opinion, please do so. http://www.pollmonkey.com/p.asp?U=2021122898 Ev, W2EV ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00476.html (6,748 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Poll Almost Closed... (score: 1)
Author: "Buck - N4PGW" <n4pgw-list1@towncorp.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:59:37 -0400
You forgot an option: "I believe grid circlers should have their own category." Buck _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00477.html (8,375 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Poll Almost Closed... (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 06:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Two quick points on this... The survey was intended to determine a general feel for what should be allowed and who thought that way. A solution wasn't intended. Giving grid circlers their own categor
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00479.html (10,113 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Poll Almost Closed... (score: 1)
Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:14:33 -0500
You may want this, and you are entitled to your opinion and I'm fine with that but I respectfully disagree and want to see more (within reason) categories. Assume for a moment we were to do away with
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00481.html (8,034 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Poll Almost Closed... (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 07:28:24 -0700
Nobody would enter the new category if there was one. The whole point is to compete with everybody else and win so the strategy would continue to be maximizing your score within the (revised) rules o
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00482.html (7,429 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Poll Almost Closed... (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
I may be speaking out of school here (I haven't participated in a Field Day for a very long time), so please accept my apologies up front if I misstate something...but as far as I can remember, an x
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00493.html (8,886 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Poll Almost Closed... (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Herrick <bdh@teleport.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:45:08 -0600
Put them in their own category. We have our fun, they have theirs. Problem solved. Why make it more complicated than it is? Why attempt to drag them down to your level? N6NB is known for pushing the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00495.html (10,417 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Poll Almost Closed... (score: 1)
Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 17:50:49 -0500
You are correct and that's my point. If you did away with all the xA - xF categories you would have a 1D station in the same category as a super club station running 15A. Now I'm not contending that
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00497.html (10,001 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Poll Almost Closed... (score: 1)
Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 17:57:11 -0500
Old age is hell. It would be nice if I could read my own notes ... make the -98's a -96 and the -99's a -98 but you probably figured that out already. -- Mike Urich, KA5CVH http://ka5cvh.com ________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00498.html (8,727 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu