Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+REMINDER\:CQWW\s+VHF\s+Contest\s+and\s+CU2QSO\s+Pioneers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+REMINDER\:CQWW\s+VHF\s+Contest\s+and\s+CU2QSO\s+Pioneers\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup); Date: Sun Jul 20 20:24:33 2003; I have nothing against the CU2QSO approach. The only thing about it is that it uses FM packet (that's true, correct?). FM packet is inherently less sensitive than weak-signal modes. So if I hear and; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00103.html (10,974 bytes)
22. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: list@rwitte.com (Bob Witte); Date: Sun Jul 20 21:22:32 2003; too starts gives If you really want to get back to basics, no computers should be used at all, right? Only submit written logs, perhaps on some form of parchment. :-) 73, Bob K0NR; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00104.html (10,513 bytes)
23. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: k8cc@comcast.net (David A. Pruett); Date: Sun Jul 20 21:36:05 2003; Is anybody on this reflector enjoying this private conversation between W2EV and K2BM on this topic? Does anybody on this reflector care? How about taking this private, please? Dave/K8CC; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00105.html (9,987 bytes)
24. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV)); Date: Sun Jul 20 23:31:13 2003; Ahh. I knew it would end like this, but I allowed myself to get sucked back in anyway. Shame on me, and my appologies to the list. QRT on this thread. For those who are willing to look beyond the ord; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00106.html (10,749 bytes)
25. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren J. Walsh); Date: Mon Jul 21 06:28:45 2003; Hi Dave, I'm sorry but I don't think this is a private conversation. I have questions about this mode for Single-Op use and wanted information. I think that the VHFContesting email list is the PROPER; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00113.html (10,634 bytes)
26. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: SteveWS4F@aol.com (SteveWS4F@aol.com); Date: Mon Jul 21 11:28:18 2003; Please! Steve, K4RF; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00118.html (8,221 bytes)
27. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr wf4r); Date: Mon Jul 21 14:52:48 2003; I've sort of enjoyed reading it. I think that I've learned something. But I do believe now that all that's necessary has been said (I think) HI. Please ignor my previous post. I've since gone to the; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00123.html (10,490 bytes)
28. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Mon Jul 21 16:57:19 2003; Well, yes - it could be taken to that extreme. However, I think the point I was trying to make was - that for many of us, the act of listening to the radio and decoding what information is there is m; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00124.html (10,402 bytes)
29. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: w2fca@capital.net (Frank Ayers); Date: Mon Jul 21 18:10:50 2003; Hi all What about when a logging program already has the information for the exchange? For example, one could load a program up with the FISTS #, name, and state of all the current fist members. Duri; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00127.html (10,669 bytes)
30. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: list@rwitte.com (Bob Witte); Date: Wed Jul 23 21:52:45 2003; That would be an opinion. And one that I mostly agree with. However, it always strikes me as odd that people involved in a technical hobby are so unnerved by new technology. It is sooooooo predictabl; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00154.html (11,365 bytes)
31. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich); Date: Wed Jul 23 21:59:54 2003; I tend to agree, however, I am of the opinion that if you beaconing with a digital mode then your initial contact SHOULD be digital to digital. At which time you can agree to QSY anywhere you darn we; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00155.html (10,315 bytes)
32. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Thu Jul 24 00:30:22 2003; Well, I think a distinction needs to be made between "the hobby" and "the contest". A contest is intended to be some kind of competition and most people who are in them seriously would like it to be; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00156.html (11,131 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 32
Page: [1] [2]