Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Why\s+we\s+participate\s+\[was\:REMINDER\:\.\.\.CU2QSOPioneers\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Why\s+we\s+participate\s+\[was\:REMINDER\:\.\.\.CU2QSOPioneers\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: Why we participate [was:REMINDER:...CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1): Author: n0jk@hotmail.com (jon jones); Date: Fri Jul 25 13:47:15 2003; that limit what you can and can't do during a contest and still be called a single-operator - unassisted. Actually, maybe that's it.. the CU2QSO system is a spotting system where the guy you are abo; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00185.html (7,626 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Re: Why we participate [was:REMINDER:...CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1): Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup); Date: Fri Jul 25 15:44:42 2003; Someone seems to be missing something here. Does calling CQ or answering a CQ put you in "assisted" category? Does working someone on PSK put you in the assisted category? Does saying "What other ban; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00187.html (8,684 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Re: Why we participate [was:REMINDER:...CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1): Author: n2im@juno.com (Charles Barkowski); Date: Fri Jul 25 16:25:01 2003; Why would it be fair to put someone in an assisted category for using CU2QSO, just because others don't? That would be like making a special limited-single-op-low-power category for those who are not; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00189.html (9,298 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]