Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHF\s+Infusion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHF\s+Infusion\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] VHF Infusion (score: 1): Author: Rick R <rick1ds@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:29:38 -0400; ARRL has tried to encourage more of the newcomers to VHF with newer categories, such as FM only and 3-banders (ABD). For several years, we have tried to have a "VHF Beginners" course that was free as; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00051.html (8,183 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Infusion (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:03:35 -0500; Before I would try to move them up to higher bands I would first get them operating other modes. Making 100 q's on 50.125 would be a whole lot more exciting than 2 on 1290 FM Just sayin' http://ka5cv; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00052.html (8,382 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Infusion (score: 1): Author: Jerry <jer.sieg@shaw.ca>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:53:17 -0600; Its a 'tough sell' any way you look at it ! When I was first licensed 30yrs ago.. I was interested in 2M SSB/CW..and my response from the Club Members was 'Nobody uses that'..2M is used for FM and Re; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00054.html (9,510 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Infusion (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:59:54 -0700; Yep - and I think this is a good thing. One thing that I have noticed over the last few years is what appears to be a disappearance of a number of the 2 Meter regulars here in Texas. These were folks; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00082.html (8,323 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Infusion (score: 1): Author: BEAMAR@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:01:23 -0400 (EDT); Here in Florida we have not seen a lot of growth on 6M. Most people seem to think the 6M button, on the radio doesn't really work. I wonder what is different in Texas? Buddy WB4OMG In a message dated; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00083.html (7,715 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Infusion (score: 1): Author: Jack W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:19:45 -0500; On 9/18/2013 1:01 PM, BEAMAR@aol.com wrote: Here in Florida we have not seen a lot of growth on 6M. Most people seem to think the 6M button, on the radio doesn't really work. I wonder what is differe; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00085.html (8,354 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Infusion (score: 1): Author: jon jones <n0jk@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:14:44 +0000; Good observation by George regarding regular 2 meter activity. Here in Kansas and Missouri the "2 Meter regulars" have all but disappeared as well. I recall in the late 80's there was a regular morni; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00100.html (8,922 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Infusion (score: 1): Author: "Mike & Becca Krzystyniak" <k9mk@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:48:26 -0500; Yup, here in north Texas the participation was the worse I have seen in many years. I had great expectations as DFW has one of the largest contest group now with 135 members, and only a couple mmade; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00101.html (11,277 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Infusion (score: 1): Author: "Donald M. Ross" <N12614@aol.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:15:04 -0500; Mike, I was one of those rovers and I tried to work you several times, but the band conditions were really screwy. I heard you in EM03 and EM05 but just wasn't able to work you. Hopefully AF5Q/R was; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00110.html (12,629 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]