Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Why\s+not\s+a\s+list\s+of\s+FM\s+\"contest\"\s+calling\s+freqs\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Why\s+not\s+a\s+list\s+of\s+FM\s+\"contest\"\s+calling\s+freqs\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Why not a list of FM "contest" calling freqs? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Thomas - WA4ZKO <wa4zko@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:16:34 -0800 (PST); Anything stopping us from creating a new list of FM "contest calling" freqs that are clear of the current ones yet gives everyone on FM a spot to hangout around? Obviously would have to get most folk; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-12/msg00028.html (7,021 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Why not a list of FM "contest" calling freqs? (score: 1): Author: Marshall-K5QE <k5qe@k5qe.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:43:01 -0600; Hello to everyone....The issue of letting the ARRL "publish" specific FM frequencies for contesting purposes was discussed in the VUAC forum at the SE VHF conference. Surprisingly, there was resistan; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-12/msg00030.html (9,761 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Why not a list of FM "contest" calling freqs? (score: 1): Author: Bob Burns W9RXR <w9rxr_@rlburns.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:58:27 -0500; The issue of letting the ARRL "publish" specific FM frequencies for contesting purposes was discussed in the VUAC forum at the SE VHF conference. Surprisingly, there was resistance to this idea....so; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-12/msg00036.html (8,780 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]