Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+multiple\s+modes\/operator\s+overload\s+WAS\:\s+VHFcontesting\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+253\,\s+Issue\s+28\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+multiple\s+modes\/operator\s+overload\s+WAS\:\s+VHFcontesting\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+253\,\s+Issue\s+28\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] multiple modes/operator overload WAS: VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 253, Issue 28 (score: 1): Author: Drew Arnett <arnett.drew@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 17:58:04 +0000; The operator overload thing came up in this thread. Seems like splitting up the contest would allow more focus and less grief. For example: cw+ssb only, digital only, fm only. Or even split cw + ssb; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2024-01/msg00070.html (7,679 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]