Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+rover\s+rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+rover\s+rules\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] rover rules (score: 1): Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:04:18 -0800; To those who know who you are: Thank you for the changes, it shows that comprimise can be a good thing. I hope this expands everyone's fun. k3uhf _____________________________________________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00061.html (6,806 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] rover rules (score: 1): Author: Steve Piotrowski <stevepio@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:11:38 -0800 (PST); Ev, I think some of the resistance is a matter of the cure being worse than the disease. Personally, I like being able to move around. A lot. Rovers Rove. I worked you this past contest from a couple; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00296.html (7,564 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover rules (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:15:39 -0800 (PST); == I understand your point-of-view, Steve. I tend to be a root-cause analyst out of laziness. If I can fix something once, I will. Revisiting the same issue cyclically makes me grumpy. :) As for what; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00301.html (8,293 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover rules (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:26:14 -0600; Mike contends Then why not just do away with any rover to rover contacts at all. After all this would eliminate any further problems that may arise when people find ways to exploit these. And yes I a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00304.html (8,111 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover rules (score: 1): Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:39:21 -0800; Ev, There have been so many posts on this thread I forgot, what is it you are trying to fix? Jim AF6O _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesti; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00306.html (8,247 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover rules (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:17:40 -0800 (PST); Hi Jim, In regard to "absurdly high scores generated by re/contacting a small number of participants...and being rewarded for doing so, publicly", there are several "fixes" that can be applied. I've; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00308.html (8,766 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover rules (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:29:42 -0600; So just how many entrants have this "disease"? Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00310.html (8,919 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover rules (score: 1): Author: stanka1ze@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:51:35 -0500; Ev, I agree, we should just cut through all of the BS and fix the problem. As a member of the community of contesters, I can not see how perfecting grid circling benefits either the entrant, the cont; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00318.html (9,871 bytes)
9. [VHFcontesting] Rover Rules (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:29:42 -0600; Frank - I have written this before to you and the list, but submitting a blank log won't do anything positive. It will confuse those who process the logs. By not participating in the contest, you hav; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00118.html (8,479 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]