Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+A\s+quirk\s+in\s+the\s+ARI\s+module\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+A\s+quirk\s+in\s+the\s+ARI\s+module\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] A quirk in the ARI module? (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net (Phil Cooper); Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 14:36:44 +0100; Hi all, Well, like Robert asked - where is everyone? I am real glad I didn't get up very early today, as the bands are in poor shape. So, I am using the SM6SRW module for ARI, and I see that there is; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00028.html (7,807 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] A quirk in the ARI module? (score: 1): Author: jon@praxisworks.org (Jon Harder); Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 14:17:27 -0000; This has caused no end of problems, but with the condx so poor, I've had plenty of time to correct them. That is if I remember to watch for it. And then there are the ops who call CQ, acknowledge a; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00029.html (9,297 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] A quirk in the ARI module? (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 07:51:59 -0700; _________________________________________________________ At least one other contest module had that problem too. Can't remember exactly which one, but it was earlier this year. Definitely needs fixi; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00030.html (7,440 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] A quirk in the ARI module? (score: 1): Author: stephen.b@cytanet.com.cy (Steve B); Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 09:07:05 +0300; I saw this feature in a different light - knowing what serial they issued me previously I now have a benchmark. The number should obviously be greater than the last ... if not you can ask the statio; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00034.html (8,598 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] A quirk in the ARI module? (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net (Phil Cooper); Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 16:53:10 +0100; Hi Steve, Well, I do appreciate your point, and yes, seeing that previous QSO number is useful - BUT - wouldn't it be better if clicking on the new serial number simply over-wrote that old one, inste; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00035.html (7,848 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] A quirk in the ARI module? (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 12:27:15 -0500; The ARI module is broken. The previous serial number can be helpful, but when you click on the current serial number in the RTTYrite window when the cursor is in the serial number field in the Entry; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00037.html (10,459 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]