Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Ability\s+to\s+QSL\s+numbers\s+given\s+to\s+you\s+by\s+other\s+stn\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Ability to QSL numbers given to you by other stn (score: 1)
Author: "Nick Kail" <m3mlr@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:31:05 -0000
Hi guys Thought I'd throw this one into the pot Over the contest last week I noticed some stations giving me a QSL on the number I have given them Anyone know the bit to do that as I have looked in t
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00338.html (7,402 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] Ability to QSL numbers given to you by other stn (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:46:17 GMT
Off the top of my head with WL 10.45 the message command is %Fn and %F4 is what did the trick in WPX The n is the number of the entry field you want to send and in WPX the 4th field contains the rece
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00339.html (8,075 bytes)

3. RE: [WriteLog] Ability to QSL numbers given to you by other stn (score: 1)
Author: "Nick Kail" <m3mlr@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:13:37 -0000
Thanks I tried %F4 and it works a treat 73's Nick 2E0MLR --Original Message-- From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of llindblom@juno.com Sent: 17 F
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00344.html (9,290 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] Ability to QSL numbers given to you by other stn (score: 1)
Author: David O Hachadorian <k6ll@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:30:51 -0700
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:31:05 -0000 "Nick Kail" <m3mlr@tiscali.co.uk> writes: I think this is a bad practice. First, it takes too much time. Second, it has the possibility to create confusion over who
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00347.html (7,956 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] Ability to QSL numbers given to you by other stn (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:33:23 +0000
The only thing that bugs me more than getting my number repeated back to me is getting a 73 included near the end! Well, maybe getting past the serial nr 599, too, but that only happens once per cont
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00350.html (9,463 bytes)

6. RE: [WriteLog] Ability to QSL numbers given to you by other stn (score: 1)
Author: "Nick Kail" <m3mlr@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:51:46 -0000
Thanks to one and all for the opinions I only asked the question as to how it was done out of curiosity not because I wanted to do it. I still a firm believer of the TU or QSL (or sometimes even a GL
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00351.html (10,027 bytes)

7. Re: [WriteLog] Ability to QSL numbers given to you by other stn (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:28:17 GMT
I used %F4 under marginal conditons (sub ESP copy) to ask 189 189 189 ???? (if I'd copied something that might or might not be 189), and again under marginal conditions for a TU message that was some
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00358.html (9,979 bytes)

8. Re: [WriteLog] Ability to QSL numbers given to you by other stn (score: 1)
Author: John E Bastin <jbastin@sssnet.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:44:32 -0500
On Feb 17, 2004, at 1:33 PM, Jerry Flanders wrote: The only thing that bugs me more than getting my number repeated back to me is getting a 73 included near the end! Well, maybe getting past the seri
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00367.html (9,909 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu