Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Friend\s+ini\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Friend\s+ini\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: "Bill, KE5OG" <ke5og@brooksdata.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 18:58:00 -0500; I downloaded the new friend.ini along with the master rtty file (thanks Ed and Don). My problem is I tried testing with my own call (KE5OG) and it won't respond. However, it responds with Don's call; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00197.html (6,577 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: Don Winn <af4z@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 11:32:14 -0400; Bill, This a problem between Writelog and Windows 98. WIN 2K works fine. Wayne has put the fix on his list of fixes but since he believes so few are using WIN98, it is not very high on the list. Yes,; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00204.html (8,352 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 17:06:05 +0000; -- I run Win98, and am not about to change. But as for a "fix", it's not exactly rocket science to do a search for the call in the field. I can do this with 4 lines of code on a file infinitely large; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00208.html (7,543 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 18:27:59 +0000; Two computers here. One Win 98 and the other ME. W0ETC _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/write; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00209.html (9,192 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:32:14 -0500; I run Win98, but really consider the friend.ini feature to one of those "cute" things added that really don't enhance or speed up operation. Using it only lengthens transmissions and slows down rate.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00210.html (8,796 bytes)
6. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: K9DJ@aol.com; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 18:06:04 EDT; I'm still using WIN 98 and would greatly appreciate a fix for the friends.ini file. Duke K9DJ _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://list; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00211.html (6,868 bytes)
7. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: no2t <no2t@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:14:42 -0400; Hi I also use WIN98 for all my machines. Don't want to play with delportio etc. So therefor as part of the large group would like to be able to use the new Friend.ini But will not change from Win98 t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00212.html (7,240 bytes)
8. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:42:09 -0500; Same situation here ... please as to a cure ... TU! 73 Billy AA4NU _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00213.html (7,311 bytes)
9. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:22:37 -0700; I run Win 98 and have no intention of causing a lot of grief by changing. Why would I want to spend money and endless amounts of time debugging problems to get to the same point where I am now. 73 de; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00214.html (7,403 bytes)
10. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: SteveWS4F@aol.com; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:07:24 EDT; I have deliberately stayed away from versoins of Windows after 98, for reasons that should be obvious after all the latest viruses. I believe there is still a very large number of Writelog users who; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00232.html (8,595 bytes)
11. RE: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: "Dimitriy Borzenko" <dibor@iname.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 01:50:58 +0200; I'm AGREED !! I' also use Win98 for Hamradio programs. --Original Message-- From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of SteveWS4F@aol.com Sent: Tuesday; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00233.html (9,329 bytes)
12. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: Bruce Ferry <ak8b@brightdsl.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:53:36 -0400; The ARRL just did a "survey" of what people use at their Ham stations: http://www.arrl.org/survey.php3?pollnr=198 WIN98 wasn't the biggest number but it was a very close second. SteveWS4F@aol.com wro; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00234.html (9,350 bytes)
13. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: "Rob K6RB" <k6rb@baymoon.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:18:15 -0700; Yet another W98 user. Rob K6RB af4z@cfl.rr.com are problem, of there is will _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00236.html (10,365 bytes)
14. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: KØBX <jduerbusch@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 01:38:14 +0000; Yet another W98SE user. I am too cheap to buy the upgrade. Other computers in the house are running XP, Win2000 so I got them all covered. But do we really need that big of a friends file? When it st; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00238.html (8,933 bytes)
15. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: John Orton WA6BOB <wa6bob@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 02:44:19 +0000; Yet another W98 & W98se user. Bob WA6BOB _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00240.html (7,422 bytes)
16. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 23:22:22 EDT; Win98-SE here too. It isn't going to go away. 73, Don - K4BEV _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00241.html (7,382 bytes)
17. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: Dave L Thompson <k4jrb@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 23:57:00 -0400; I am using W 98 Second edition on the shack computer. This is also the PC that receives the CQ 160 logs each year from trey's robot. Using Norton seems to stop any problems. However I hear that the h; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00242.html (8,387 bytes)
18. [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: "Alan Maenchen" <ad6e@inreach.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 04:28:54 -0000; Guess I'm a split personality. I have W98se on the "station machine" and XP on the lap top that runs WL whenever I'm not at home. I'm actually surprised DOS wasn't even listed. At work the vast major; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00243.html (8,315 bytes)
19. Re: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: "Jose ct1aoz" <ct1aoz@netvisao.pt>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:42:54 +0100; Hi All I still have W98SE. Joe are absolutely right. WF1B Ray put it in just for the 10 or 20 (or a little more guys) that we might know.And here is the difference I think the discussed friend.ini sh; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00245.html (10,321 bytes)
20. RE: [WriteLog] Friend ini (score: 1): Author: "Don Cassel" <doncassel@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 07:15:22 -0400; I agree that the file is much too large but how can Ed determine what should be in and what should be left out? My solution is to edit a file for my own use which includes calls that I know or have f; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00249.html (10,310 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]