Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+K9JY\s+website\s+\:\s+An\s+appreciation\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] K9JY website : An appreciation. (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Kirkwood" <bjk@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 19:25:03 -0000
I must set the record straight about WL documentation. When I started trying to use WL some three years back I printed off from Scot's site, put them in a binder plus other wL stuff and tried to use
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00053.html (7,596 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] K9JY website : An appreciation. (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:05:35 -0600
"I do, however, stand by my contention that it very unforgiving of operator error in the set up phase". I must concur with my friend from Waiheke Island. We run Writelog at AA5NT doing Multi-2 and it
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00058.html (8,352 bytes)

3. RE: [WriteLog] K9JY website : An appreciation. (score: 1)
Author: "Don Cassel" <ve3xd@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:39:05 -0500
I really like Writelog and haven't used anything else that could replace it for the types of operations that I do. Like others in this thread I find setup to be a hassle especially when moving to a d
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00059.html (9,154 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] K9JY website : An appreciation. (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 16:05:07 -0500
I agree with Bob. After the SSB test, I set up for CQWW CW. It wasn't totally from scratch as I copied my Window layout and message buffers from last year's contest log, but still required a bit of w
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00061.html (10,111 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu