- 1. [WriteLog] My post on WriteLog reflector (score: 1)
- Author: wink@rochester.rr.com (Wink)
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 12:32:58 -0500
- Marty, I'm sorry if I inconvenienced you with my trivial posting on the WriteLog reflector that did not conform to your expectations for this reflector. From now on I'll make sure I send all my quest
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00006.html (7,077 bytes)
- 2. [WriteLog] My post on WriteLog reflector (score: 1)
- Author: gbaron@charter.net (Charter)
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 11:42:58 -0600
- Or better yet, just ignore it. There is far too much of this insulting matter going on here.
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00008.html (8,001 bytes)
- 3. [WriteLog] My post on WriteLog reflector (score: 1)
- Author: martyt@pobox.com (Marty Tippin)
- Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 15:27:17 -0600
- Don't be a jackass, Gary. Just use some common sense and try to keep your postings at least somewhat related to WriteLog. And if you want to flame me, do it in a private e-mail, not on the reflector.
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00013.html (7,844 bytes)
- 4. [WriteLog] My post on WriteLog reflector (score: 1)
- Author: faunt@panix.com (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604)
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 16:52:13 -0500 (EST)
- I hate to say it, but Marty was wrong in the first place. Changes to the way the list work should be considered by the whole readership before they are made, and perhaps even discussed. If I'm the on
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00015.html (8,757 bytes)
- 5. [WriteLog] My post on WriteLog reflector (score: 1)
- Author: tombaugh@discoverynet.com (Tom Baugh AE9B)
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 07:22:36 -0600
- Seems to me that less information about Writelog is being diseminated (sp) and more non Writelog information spoken... Now people want to be judge jury and executioner... anyone else want to pick sid
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-12/msg00028.html (10,258 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu