Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+New\s+CQ\s+WW\s+rule\s+on\s+lockout\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: K6UFO Mark Aaker <k6ufo@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
How do I setup my Multi-op network of computers to meet the new CQ WW rule on lockout? The new CQ WW rule: I understand how to set this up when the two radios are connected to one computer, using "Ra
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00000.html (7,410 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
When using more than one computer, either as SO2R or Multi-Op, they must be networked and connected to each other via WriteLog.  Use "Link to Network" command which I think is on the WL Setup menu.  
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00001.html (10,051 bytes)

3. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:55:20 -0800
I can see where this would work for RTTY where the computer is always doing the sending. How does it handle CW or voice? Again, probably ok when the computer is doing the sending, but what if one of
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00002.html (11,818 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 14:52:18 -0500
Good question Randy but I would think SSB and CW should work similar to RTTY. 73, Don AA5AU http://www.aa5au.com http://www.rttycontesting.com I can see where this would work for RTTY where the compu
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00006.html (12,565 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: Sid Ashen-Brenner <sashen@swbell.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 15:55:32 -0500
Some times, One really needs to remember that Locks (of any kind) ONLY keep Honest People Honest! Everyone else just considers them to be a minor annoyance. Sid N0OBM ________________________________
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00007.html (13,683 bytes)

6. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:58:07 -0700
SSB and CW do work the same as RTTY with regard to the lockout in WriteLog. What is different, though, is that CW may be sent by paddle (or, SSB by microphone) and WriteLog has no way of knowing and
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00008.html (13,480 bytes)

7. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:01:51 -0400
Just for clarity, I think it's important to point out that #1 applies to lockout over a network, not when using Writelog's SO2R features with two transmitters connected to the same computer. In the l
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00011.html (14,995 bytes)

8. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: Mike Heideman <mike_heideman@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:18:29 +0000
Don AA5AU wrote in response to Mark K6UFO: This doesn't answer Mark's original question. How do you set up 4 computers in the network such that lockout is enforced between two or more computers on th
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00013.html (9,260 bytes)

9. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <w0yk@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:09:37 -0700
That's right, the lockout is across all computers on the network. From the Help file ... Tools RTTY Single Transmitter Lockout There are two modes for doing transmitter lockout's for RTTY. Both of th
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00014.html (11,485 bytes)

10. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:37:22 -0700
The only method of actual implementation of the 100% lockout is to use an old time octopus. No other method has only one signal on the air with the exception of RTTY on one computer with the setup Ed
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00019.html (11,283 bytes)

11. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:07:16 -0400
The problem with the CQ rule is that it is completely unrealistic for the "multiplier radio" in M/S and M/2. None of the popular software provides a "band aware" interlock function (and interlocks -
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00020.html (13,397 bytes)

12. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:14:26 -0800
Each CQ contest has its own multi-op rules, so you can't make broad generalizations like this. For CQWW, the MS rule actually allows two stations to transmit at the same time. One is the so called "r
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-09/msg00021.html (16,531 bytes)

13. Re: [WriteLog] New CQ WW rule on lockout (score: 1)
Author: Rick Tavan <rtavan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:53:39 -0700
Rick's annual rant: Sigh. I sure wish it were legal for a group of ops to take turns operating an SO2R station and call it M/S. No need for a separate mult station, either. The cockamamie ten minute
/archives//html/WriteLog/2011-10/msg00011.html (16,148 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu