Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RTTY\s+INTERFACE\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: K8fu@aol.com
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 09:11:16 EDT
Hi All...................................... I R Der Frogmeister K8FU......................... I'm seeking recommendations for an interface unit that will work with WriteLog for MMTTY in FSK. Bought
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00137.html (7,274 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: Steve AI9T <steve@ai9t.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 09:26:59 -0400
Frogmeister I just set up a Microham "Micro Keyer" for a friends laptop. It seems to work OK. He uses it with MMTTY and Logger 32. It says it will also work with Writelog. Don't know why it wouldn't
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00138.html (8,453 bytes)

3. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: Doug McDuff <w4ox@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:32:34 +0000
I have used the MK with WL from KG4 and at home, works FB. 73, Doug W4OX / KG4OX _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00139.html (9,176 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:11:10 +0000
-- Well, I bought the Microham USB II about a month ago, and it does OK on everything with Writelog except RTTY. Rig will key, and MMTTY shows messages but absolutely no shift on the carrier. All ot
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00141.html (8,025 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: "Neal Campbell" <nealk3nc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:30:47 -0400
Could you report how you configured it? I do see FSK capability in the unit so you are restricted to afsk. Did the rig ever key when you clicked the TX button on mmtty? 73 de Neal k3nc support WriteL
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00143.html (8,951 bytes)

6. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: "lmorris" <lmorris@lenmar.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:22:48 -0400
Hi, I have a RigExpert (Plus) that works just fine with Writelog. I use MMTTY with it.. I don't remember that was much of a problem, as once I started to play with it, it went in with no problems. Co
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00144.html (9,193 bytes)

7. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:51:22 -0400
Ed, As I responded to Froggy on the microHAM support e-mail: This not a "fault" of any software or hardware ... simply a lack of a common interface. The potential solutions are: 1) the ability of Wri
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00145.html (10,819 bytes)

8. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 18:58:46 -0500
I'm using the microHam DigiKeyer. Works great, but substantially more expensive than the USB II. 73, Duane -- Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas http://home.austin.rr.com/ac5aa _______________________
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00150.html (8,516 bytes)

9. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:05:40 -0400
Well, 2 - 2.5x times, for all the extra features it gives you, it was worth it to me: - winkey keyer - FSK - voice recording for Writelog, etc. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court,
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00151.html (8,092 bytes)

10. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:53:21 -0500
Joe explains it perfectly! Of the potential solutions given by Joe (all are excellently thought out), I can tell you confidently that #3 and #4 will not happen. I think both #1 and #2 are viable and
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00152.html (12,329 bytes)

11. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: "W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 19:03:24 -0700
How about MicroHAM adds another virtual com port and decode and utilize "TXD" for an FSK output? Why shift all the blame to Writelog? Why doesn't MicroHAM take some take some responsibility? 73 Jim W
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00153.html (12,446 bytes)

12. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:45:57 -0400
Jim, Who is blaming Writelog? Since when should microHAM be responsible to add features not provided by a program's author (in this case the author of the MMTTY plug-in for Writelog)? microHAM suppor
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00155.html (15,429 bytes)

13. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 03:52:44 +0000
ReallY? Just how many OmniVIB+s do you own and operate with the USB II? -- Well, I don't use AFSK for the many reasons previously stated. And will someone please explain to me why the USB II has a ca
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00156.html (8,373 bytes)

14. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:54:56 -0400
For two reasons: 1) the FSK output is available when MMTTY is used with EXTFSK in the following situations that I know of: MMTTY stand-alone, MMTTY with Logger32, DX4Win, DXLab/WinWarbler, N1MM Logg
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00157.html (10,082 bytes)

15. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY INTERFACE (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:46:03 -0500
I agree, Jim - the DigiKeyer's excellent built-in sound card, single USB connection to the PC, and FSK support, it is exactly what I was looking for. Keying, though not done as in the microKeyer, is
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00159.html (9,205 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu