Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+SO2R\s+with\s+RITTY\s+and\s+MMTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+SO2R\s+with\s+RITTY\s+and\s+MMTTY\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] SO2R with RITTY and MMTTY (score: 1): Author: jimsmith@shaw.ca (Jim Smith); Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 23:19:50 -0800; Thanks for the comments. What I think I would like to be able to change during a contest is the audio level into RITTY as I don't think it is working as well on weak signals as it can. I guess my que; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-04/msg00016.html (9,785 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] SO2R with RITTY and MMTTY (score: 1): Author: George Johnson" <w1zt@arrl.net (George Johnson); Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 08:27:57 -0500; Jim, Yes, I think adjustment of audio levels significantly influences the performance of sound card decoders. I use RITTY but am experimenting with MMTTY and other sound card systems. I still prefer; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-04/msg00017.html (12,464 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] SO2R with RITTY and MMTTY (score: 1): Author: jimsmith@shaw.ca (Jim Smith); Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 11:08:00 -0800; Thanks for the suggestions, both here and direct. I'll implement a hardware level control and see how it works. I'll report the results here but probably not for a month or so (although the EA RTTY i; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-04/msg00021.html (7,051 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] SO2R with RITTY and MMTTY (score: 1): Author: nasfred@1bigred.com (Mike); Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 18:47:37 -0500; Hello Jim, The audio level going to RITTY shouldn't have much affect on weak signal performance as long as you keep the level at a reasonable level. You can use the RITTY's input level adjust instead; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-04/msg00023.html (10,897 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] SO2R with RITTY and MMTTY (score: 1): Author: don.wsixffh@verizon.net (Donald Eriksen); Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 18:27:54 -0800; Jim, Mike and others, here are my observations and the solution to sound board Line in level setting I've used for years. I got an inexpensive Optimus SA-155 compact stereo amp. and connected it to t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-04/msg00025.html (12,966 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] SO2R with RITTY and MMTTY (score: 1): Author: vk4uc@ozemail.com.au (John Cashen); Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 23:13:46 +1000; During my shortened BARTG effort(I even missed XR0X, although I did hear his pileup) I took a little time to compare RITTY with MMTTY. Both used 16 bit SB soundboards which were each connected their; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-03/msg00225.html (9,023 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] SO2R with RITTY and MMTTY (score: 1): Author: jimsmith@shaw.ca (Jim Smith); Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 02:07:13 -0800; I also use RITTY with WL. Sometimes it seems to work well on weaker signals and sometimes it doesn't. (No multipath or polar flutter.) I have this feeling that if the audio level isn't right RITTY do; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-03/msg00254.html (7,551 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] SO2R with RITTY and MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner" <w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:30:29 -0800; I've been a long-time user of RITTY and I agree with your observations, Jim. Here, I use RITTY with either WriteLog or RTTY by WF1B, but I also run it on a separate computer where I can change the fi; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-03/msg00256.html (7,329 bytes)
9. [WriteLog] SO2R with RITTY and MMTTY (score: 1): Author: nasfred@1bigred.com (Mike); Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 19:19:09 -0500; Hello Jim, RITTY works great with WL. When using RITTY with WL, you can still select the filters from the RITTY window along with switching between reverse receiver and/or transmit and change the fly; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-03/msg00272.html (8,700 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]