Hello Jim,
RITTY works great with WL. When using RITTY with WL, you can still select
the filters from the RITTY window along with switching between reverse
receiver and/or transmit and change the flywheel capability.
Not sure what other parameters you would want to adjust in a contest. You
should set-up several paramters prior to using RITTY with WL. For example,
the filter size, center freq., shift, etc.
73,
Mike, K4GMH
At 02:07 AM 3/28/02 -0800, Jim Smith wrote:
>I also use RITTY with WL. Sometimes it seems to work well on weaker
>signals and sometimes it doesn't. (No multipath or polar flutter.) I
>have this feeling that if the audio level isn't right RITTY doesn't work
>as well as it can. I have tried running it by itself in a DOS box and,
>with audio levels adjusted appropriately using the settings available in
>RITTY it was great. Under WL the ability to set RITTY parameters
>doesn't seem to be there and the performance is far from great. i.e. if
>the relatively weak signal were cw instead of RTTY it would be solid
>copy as opposed to mostly garbage.
>
>Do you RITTY users get good weak signal performance from RITTY when used
>with WL?
>
>Am I missing something?
>
>73 de Jim Smith VE7FO
>
>
>John Cashen wrote:
>
>> During my shortened BARTG effort(I even missed XR0X, although I did
>> hear his pileup) I took a little time to compare RITTY with MMTTY.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>WriteLog mailing list
>WriteLog@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>
|