Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+WL\s+S\&P\s+plus\s+Run\s+modes\?\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 06:25:18 -0000
Loyd That's three keys. I want to do all of that using just the enter key. While running I already can, by setting "Enter sends exchange/QRZ" What we want is to be able to do the same thing when S&P.
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00018.html (11,537 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: Dennis Mowers <k5ya@gvtc.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:26:42 -0500
Recently there has been another series of emails, asking for Run mode, and a separate S&P mode to be included in Writelog. Wayne, there are many CW contesters waiting for you to add this feature, so
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00054.html (9,279 bytes)

3. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:32:02 -0000
Your suggestion is not a good one. For maximum efficiency, one should hit ENTER part way thru the call, so you come back to the other station sooner, and complete the typing of the call as it is bein
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00057.html (7,767 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:58:31 -0400
Something close is already there: From the CW/SSB message help menu"[% followed by] the letter O The RIT is cleared on the connected radio (if its radio interface supports this function)." 73, Blake
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00058.html (7,774 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:11:45 -0700
Being a participant rather than a spectator in this issue, I'd like to suggest the term "Advanced CW Mode" (or something similar) to encompass a number of these related highly desired functionalities
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00059.html (11,862 bytes)

6. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:43:32 -0700
Umh, this should "play well" if D4B calls you at 40+WPM :-) Let's see... 4,600+ QSOs (times) 4,600 *unnecessary* times of pressing (or lightly tapping) the space bar. Hmmm...something to look forwar
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00060.html (8,718 bytes)

7. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: "G3SJJ" <g3sjj@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:59:06 +0100
If he is an "advanced" op then he won't mind what your speed or what delays are in your exchange. Chris G3SJJ Umh, this should "play well" if D4B calls you at 40+WPM :-) Let's see... 4,600+ QSOs (tim
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00061.html (10,286 bytes)

8. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: "G3SJJ" <g3sjj@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:24:27 +0100
"Alternative mode" is a little kinder to those of us who have over 30 years of contesting experience under our belts and can even run at 200+ an hour in contests with more challenging exchanges using
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00062.html (13,478 bytes)

9. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:35:54 -0400
Eric Hilding very logically wrote: "Before folks scream "leave things the way they are", I suggest ALL the enhancements we have been discussing should be left "OFF" in a basic WL installation, and av
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00063.html (8,338 bytes)

10. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: "llindblom@juno.com" <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:19:06 GMT
I second Shelby's comments on this! Also, maybe a Windows version of TR if and when delivered will take care of the "few." I say "if" because I seem to remember a Windows version of TR being initiall
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00064.html (9,143 bytes)

11. [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: Dennis Mowers <k5ya@gvtc.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:33:55 -0500
1. After a call is entered, and the exchange is sent using "enter", the cursor needs to move to the next field that an entry will be made in, without using the space bar. Thanks to K0CF for pointing
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00065.html (8,450 bytes)

12. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:52:00 -0700
Chris, G3SJJ suggested: Good idea, Chris. How about "Alternative Contesting Mode" (ACM vs. AM ... so that some folks won't think it is a switch for Amplitude Modulation for "Alternative Voice-Automat
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00066.html (8,866 bytes)

13. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: ad6e@inreach.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
The Locust is a bit insulting when he suggests an advanced CW mode that does little "advancement" for those of us who can type reasonably well. If he needs a crutch for poor typing skills, then maybe
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00068.html (8,436 bytes)

14. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: "G3SJJ" <g3sjj@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:11:43 +0100
Exactly, how about CM=1 to enable it, Crutch Mode Chris G3SJJ The Locust is a bit insulting when he suggests an advanced CW mode that does little "advancement" for those of us who can type reasonably
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00069.html (9,162 bytes)

15. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <afrugoli@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:34:10 -0400
While typing is not my downfall, my cw copying skills and my station are. I'm rarely blessed with operating from a station/location that my rate is high enough to warrant keeping my hands that close
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00070.html (10,996 bytes)

16. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:08:31 -0700
HA! But it's not really about the typing as much as NOT having to do some *unnecessary* things...and using more Automation for a significant time-savings. As previously stated, I now like the term "A
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00071.html (9,346 bytes)

17. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:39:32 -0700
_________________________________________________ I can only imagine how you did with the girls... ;-) -- Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@co
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00072.html (8,480 bytes)

18. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: ad6e@inreach.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, the most useful class in high school was typing... for more reasons than the obvious .. :-) Perhaps we can just call this stuff "TR Mode"? WL already has a "CT mode" function that can be turned
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00073.html (10,941 bytes)

19. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:57:45 -0400
Amen. The top-tier operators that I've watch operate can type in 75% of the callsigns of the stations calling them BEFORE the calling station is even finished transmitting. Their isn't any amount of
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00074.html (8,773 bytes)

20. Re: [WriteLog] WL S&P plus Run modes? (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 04:17:04 +0000
_________________________________________________ The girls in my typing class played the defensive line on our football team. Ed _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list
/archives//html/WriteLog/2005-07/msg00076.html (9,061 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu