Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+What\s+Have\s+I\s+missed\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: Allan Briscoe" <abriscoe@direct.ca (Allan Briscoe)
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:33:12 -0700
OK .. I admit to being a relatively new user to Writelog and the reflector, but somewhere along the line I have missed the reason that some folks (seems to be predominantly RTTY contesters) seem to f
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00016.html (8,574 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@akorn.net (Ed)
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 20:40:05 +0000
Allan Briscoe wrote: OK .. I admit to being a relatively new user to Writelog and the reflector, but somewhere along the line I have missed the reason that some folks (seems to be predominantly RTTY
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00018.html (8,820 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: ravnic@email.com (Simon Ravnic)
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 23:15:54 +0200
I would say 3830 list, hosted on contesting.com is the appropriate address to send you score to. I agree totally agree with Allan on this one. And Ed, you can see your friends score there. 73 Simon,
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00020.html (9,063 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: W. Wright" <w5xd@writelog.com (W. Wright)
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 16:32:07 -0500
It is my preference that scores get posted to the 3830 reflector and dedicate the WriteLog reflector to topics more closely related to the software. But its pretty easy for me to delete the score pos
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00021.html (10,390 bytes)

5. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: k5iid@ntelos.net (Tom Horton)
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 02:09:35 -0400
Me too...use the 3830 reflector...that's what it's for and you will see many more scores to compare with. 73< Tom K5IID -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.com Administr
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00023.html (10,098 bytes)

6. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: nz3o@arrl.net (ARS NZ3O (Byron) FM29fx)
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 21:48:12 -0400
Amen! The tag line says it all. Simon's TAGLINE: -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.com Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-writelo
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00025.html (9,041 bytes)

7. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: djaksa@msn.com (Dave & Judi Jaksa)
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 22:38:47 -0500
Allen, I am also relatively new WriteLog user, having very recently converted over from many years of using CT. With that said, here are my observations on what you may, or may not, have missed. I ha
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00027.html (10,530 bytes)

8. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: jimsmith@home.com (Jim Smith)
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 01:51:40 -0700
Allan I too was wondering why all the contest scores here. Sure glad you asked before I did. <g> I routinely post my contests scores on the 3830 reflector and as a recent subscriber to this list, it
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00029.html (10,490 bytes)

9. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 08:07:03 -0500
You guys need to be a little more patient! Over the past several years, there have been relatively few RTTY contest score posts! Most are posted to the WF1B RTTY reflector and/or the 3830 reflector,
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00030.html (13,271 bytes)

10. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: wb5qlr@excite.com (Tom Stripling)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 12:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
over learn reflectors heavy wonder just I for one use WriteLog for ALL my contesting, independent of the mode. It makes it very easy to find all my contesting contacts, as well as preparing the files
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00034.html (9,551 bytes)

11. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: JDY18@aol.com (JDY18@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:12:02 EDT
I am also a relatively new WL user. My first WL contest was the ARRL RTTY roundup, and I had a lot of questions on using WL for RTTY. I recently used it for the CQ WPX contest. It was so straight-for
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00035.html (8,198 bytes)

12. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: scot@k9jy.com (Scot Herrick)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:01:05 -0500
Every reflector's strength is also it's weakness. What I have observed over the last year and a half on the reflector is fewer 'new person' questions and a lot more 'advanced' questions, answers and
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00036.html (11,622 bytes)

13. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: n0aj@worldnet.att.net (Jim Kinser)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 18:10:23 -0500
Works real good in CW contests too. Using the F keys for exchanges, etc. make it very effective. Just don't use the decoder, you will have violated the CW OP's commandment: "Thou Shalt Use Only The C
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00038.html (8,856 bytes)

14. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: nz3o@arrl.net (ARS NZ3O (Byron) FM29fx)
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 20:24:48 -0400
I think the RTTY traffic is relatively new. At least, I didn't notice it before a short time ago. I use WRITElog for SSB/CW contests, some serious and some casual, and find this reflector FB for supp
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00040.html (10,003 bytes)

15. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:21:38 -0500
There have been some new RTTY users recently, in part due to the boom in soundcard use and in part due to the appearance of the RigBlaster. New users of any mode is a good thing for many reasons. So
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00041.html (9,450 bytes)

16. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:48:03 -0500
I wasn't going to add to this thread BUT... John is 100% correct, many SSB and CW contesters are getting curious about RTTY and as John said, with the sound cards, more operators are entering RTTY co
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00042.html (11,698 bytes)

17. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:17:15 -0500
I wasn't going to add to this thread BUT... John is 100% correct, many SSB and CW contesters are getting curious about RTTY and as John said, with the sound cards, more operators are entering RTTY co
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00044.html (11,699 bytes)

18. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: k1vv@tmlp.com (BobD)
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 07:12:55 -0400
How have the SM6SRW contest modules worked ? Our WL is working fine now for CW and Phone ... Even with the new releases of WL there have been problems with bugs ... which had to be fixed .. and refix
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00046.html (13,092 bytes)

19. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: mmunevar@tutopia.com (Mario Munevar)
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 10:46:31 -0500
Hello, users of WriteLog! But............ Minimum configuration. I use WriteLog in their minimum expression. A single computer, a sound card, a radio (about to explode!). Never use packetcluster. Som
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00052.html (13,142 bytes)

20. [WriteLog] What Have I missed (score: 1)
Author: jbrannig@optonline.net (Jim Brannigan)
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 19:18:15 -0400
Hello all, I'm a CT convert. I work a few major CW contests during the year, WL has been great. I fooled around with the RTTY package and my PK-232 'cause it was there....sound card fooling around to
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-04/msg00061.html (9,900 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu