Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+FT\-1000\s+vs\.\s+FT\-1000D\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+FT\-1000\s+vs\.\s+FT\-1000D\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] FT-1000 vs. FT-1000D (score: 1): Author: John Ahlbom <john.ahlbom@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:41:16 +0300; What is the difference between an FT-1000 and FT-1000D, both early 1990. Filters, BFP-1 function, other ?? John, OH5NZ john.ahlbom@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Yaesu mail; /archives//html/Yaesu/2009-10/msg00001.html (6,248 bytes)
2. Re: [Yaesu] FT-1000 vs. FT-1000D (score: 1): Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:02:55 -0700; The 1000D is the same as the 1000 with the addition of: BPF-1 Bandpass Filter Module TCXO-1 High Stability Master Reference Oscillator plus optional filters in the 3rd IF. de Paul, W8AEF ZF2JI/ZF2TA; /archives//html/Yaesu/2009-10/msg00002.html (7,001 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] FT-1000 vs. FT-1000D (score: 1): Author: John Ahlbom <john.ahlbom@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:05:09 +0300; To W8AEF, Paul, K5DL, Cecil, "Pat", SM6CPI, Kjell, K4FX, Bill, K6RB, Rob, N9WQ, Dave, thanks for your comments on FT-1000 vs. FT-1000D differences ! I agree, the FT-1000 / D series is a great radio,; /archives//html/Yaesu/2009-10/msg00003.html (6,708 bytes)
4. Re: [Yaesu] FT-1000 vs. FT-1000D (score: 1): Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:04:45 -0700; Be careful with that sub-receiver. As a for-instance, if you do not have a filter installed in the sub-receiver 600-Hz BW position, are listening on cw with the main receiver and do an A>B, your sub; /archives//html/Yaesu/2009-10/msg00005.html (8,212 bytes)
5. Re: [Yaesu] FT-1000 vs. FT-1000D (score: 1): Author: k6rb@baymoon.com; Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:01:30 -0700 (PDT); That is absolutely right. When I first got my 1000D, I thought the sub-RX was gone because I had the 500 Hz filter selected. You can get a 600 Hz filter for the sub-RX, but since I have two FT-1000s; /archives//html/Yaesu/2009-10/msg00006.html (9,570 bytes)
6. Re: [Yaesu] FT-1000 vs. FT-1000D (score: 1): Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:53:56 -0700; I modified my sub receiver slightly: I removed the chassis wire from pin 1 of J6007, installed a 'Y' pin extension to pin 3 of P6007 and paralled the CW-N and CW chassis wires. An easily reversable c; /archives//html/Yaesu/2009-10/msg00007.html (8,273 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]