Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+FT1000D\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+FT1000D\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: wb@neonelite.com (Willem Braeckevelt); Date: Fri Mar 7 02:12:47 2003; Hello dr OM's On my FT1000D i have some rare problem everytime after transmit a few seconds is my receiver less sensitive and it come back to normal. Anyone had this also? 73 Wim ON5JY; /archives//html/Yaesu/2003-03/msg00009.html (6,166 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: wa3gin@erols.com (David Jordan); Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:52:32 -0500; Hi Folks, My friend recently acquired a FT1000D. He wanted to know how he could get the latest version of software for his radio. Can he down load it from the web or is it a IC chip that must be inst; /archives//html/Yaesu/2001-11/msg00054.html (6,363 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: akim@ptq.pemex.com (Lic. Andres Kim); Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:45:02 +0100; Hi, I decided not to bother, I changed the Control Unit board, 6.0 Version with no problems, didn`t have to adjust anything at all. Saludos de XE1KIM Andy Kim --Mensaje original-- De: yaesu-admin@con; /archives//html/Yaesu/2001-11/msg00055.html (7,100 bytes)
4. [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: robin@g3tkf.freeserve.co.uk (Robin Thompson); Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:45:02 +0000; Not too sure why this came to me direct and not the reflector ? The latest version is V6.0 and it's an IC - available from your local dealer or Yaesu direct. 73 G3TKF Robin Thompson; /archives//html/Yaesu/2001-11/msg00056.html (6,953 bytes)
5. [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: wa3gin@erols.com (David Jordan); Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 08:17:38 -0400; Greetings, Can someone tell me where I can locate a copy of the CAT software necessary to operate the FT1000D or FT900 from my PC? thanks, dave wa3gin -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/yae; /archives//html/Yaesu/2001-08/msg00002.html (6,503 bytes)
6. [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: ContstEmailAlias@aol.com (ContstEmailAlias@aol.com); Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 09:33:32 EDT; Dave, Many logging programs will do this for you, like our Log Windows. http://www.logwindows.com You'll also need the IF-232C interface to plug into your 900 or 1000. << Greetings, Can someone tell; /archives//html/Yaesu/2001-08/msg00003.html (6,913 bytes)
7. [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: wa3gin@erols.com (David Jordan); Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 22:59:27 -0500; Hi Folks, Got the DC to DC transformer from Yaesu Parts, for the Display board. Installed the new transformer...the little pig whines like it's tail is stuck in the barn door. The display lights-up b; /archives//html/Yaesu/2000-11/msg00001.html (6,529 bytes)
8. [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: Steve Lawrence <smlx@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:57:33 -0700; Anyone know of a source for touch up paint for the front panel of the FT1000D? Tks & 73, Steve WB6RSE _______________________________________________ Yaesu mailing list Yaesu@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/Yaesu/2004-10/msg00020.html (6,209 bytes)
9. [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: "lou de beer" <lou.de.beer@general-net.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 23:59:33 -0800; I have a nice FT1000D for sale ser.no.2D210093 with firmware version 6.0...$2100.00 _______________________________________________ Yaesu mailing list Yaesu@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/Yaesu/2004-11/msg00000.html (5,675 bytes)
10. [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: "WILLEM BRAECKEVELT" <on5jy@telenet.be>; Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:02:06 +0200; Dr OM's My rig FT1000D is unsensitive few moments by changover ON5JY Wim Halewijnstraat,17 8780- OOSTROZEBEKE Belgium on5jy@telenet.be _______________________________________________ Yaesu mailing li; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00002.html (6,126 bytes)
11. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: "ukbrown" <ukbrown@acsol.net>; Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 17:14:13 -0700; I want to send my FT1000D to get it upgraded with roofing filters and any other mods to make it a better rig. To whom should I be talking with. PTL bill K0UK _________________________________________; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00004.html (6,904 bytes)
12. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 20:38:32 -0400; Perhaps the money would be more wisely spent buying a Mark V rig and selling the D. It is a much better radio than the D. _______________________________________________ Yaesu mailing list Yaesu@cont; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00005.html (7,317 bytes)
13. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: Randy Farmer <w8fn@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 20:59:57 -0500; I respectfully beg to differ. The 1000D with the roofing filters and the minor W8JI improvements is an exceptionally fine radio, with **much** better ergonomics than its successors. To each his own..; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00006.html (7,572 bytes)
14. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:32:21 -0500; I agree... I have the D and an MP. Unless there have been quantum leaps in performance improvements made in the Mark V version I don't find it to be any better. Got lots more gadgetry to play with bu; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00007.html (8,744 bytes)
15. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:02:27 -0500; I have found all of the Yaesu HF rigs to be excellent. The one you choose is a matter of personal taste. My first was the 101E purchased back in 1977. It gave me many years of enjoyment. About 10 yea; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00008.html (9,536 bytes)
16. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: John Muzyka <g4rcg@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 06:47:56 +0100 (BST); You must be kidding!! I have owned the FT-1000MP & Field and the Pro 3 and none of them come near the FT1000D for received signal, dont know what you were using but it does not sound like FT1KD John; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00009.html (8,362 bytes)
17. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 09:48:40 -0400; I have owned both and IMHO the MkV has a better receiver and the transmitted audio is far superior and certainly more flexible to change. I may be comparing apples to oranges because my D did not hav; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00011.html (9,173 bytes)
18. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: John Tait <bravo@iol.ie>; Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:07:22 +0100; *I got rid of my Pro2 and my MKV. I now have an FT1000D as main, an FT990 as standby, and my FT1000MP with all mods, Roofing filter, INRADs etc is in it's box as emergency spare. As Randy says.. "to; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00012.html (8,242 bytes)
19. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: "Mike Schatzberg" <cherokeehillfarm@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:54:02 -0400; Hello Yaesu Fans: Unfortunately, Sherwood Engineering hasn't tested an upgraded FT 1000D with the roofing filter. But it is interesting to note that the unmodified radios, Mark V and 1000D, had the s; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00014.html (11,921 bytes)
20. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:15:42 -0500; I sold a Pro II as well. I ran it for a couple of weeks through a receiver multicoupler sharing the same antenna and the Pro II had a slight edge on the FT-1000D in the receive department....but the; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00016.html (10,503 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]